About this trial
Stroke volume is a major determinant of tissue perfusion and therefore a key parameter to monitor in patients with hemodynamic instability and hypoperfusion. Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) Velocity-Time Integral (VTI) measured using pulsed wave Doppler is widely used as an estimation of stroke volume and should be a competence required for every Intensive Care Unit (ICU) physician. Recently, research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applied to medical imaging constituted a breakthrough in the acquisition of images. The goal of the present study is to characterize and quantify the reliability and reproducibility of LVOT VTI measurements by comparing the measures obtained by minimally-trained operators and expert physicians, guided by UltraSight AI software.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
>10% decrease in mean arterial pressure with respect to baseline value
Skin mottling, oliguria (<0,5 ml/kg/h)
change in the level of consciousness
hyperlactatemia
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Fluid challenge (cristalloids) OR passive leg raising
Other interventionPatients in whom fluid administration is considered necessary, based on hypoperfusion criteria will be included in the trial. One member of group A and one of group B will proceed independently to evaluate LVOT VTI, guided by the UltraSight AI software to obtain the best 5-chamber view. The measure of LVOT VTI will be calculated as the average of three consecutive cardiac cycles. The order of acquisition between group A and B will be randomized. Each operator will be blinded to the values obtained by the other. After baseline LVOT VTI measurement, a 250 mL fluid challenge of crystalloids or a passive leg raising test (non-pharmacological and reversible fluid challenge of roughly 250 mL), depending on the appreciation of the clinician will be performed. Measurements will be repeated immediately after the fluid challenge by the same operators, still blinded to each other, guided by the UltraSight AI software. The order of the 2nd acquisition will be the same as the 1st acquisition
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Relative difference expressed in percentage of LVOT VTI measurement evaluated by the minimally trained operators as compared with LVOT VTI measurement by experts.
To assess the equivalence of measures of LVOT VTI obtained by minimally trained operators as compared with those obtained by the experts, both guided by artificial intelligence. Both measures of VTI pre and post-fluid challenge will be considered.
Secondary outcomes
The relative difference expressed in percentage of LVOT VTI measurement, pre-fluid challenge, evaluated by the minimally trained operators as compared with those obtained by experts.
To assess the equivalence of the individual measures of LVOT VTI, pre-fluid challenge, obtained by the minimally trained operators as compared with those obtained by the experts, both guided by artificial intelligence.
The relative difference expressed in percentage of LVOT VTI measurement, post-fluid challenge, evaluated by the minimally trained operators as compared with those obtained by experts.
To assess the equivalence of the individual measures of LVOT VTI, post-fluid challenge, obtained by the minimally trained operators as compared with those obtained by the experts, both guided by artificial intelligence.
Difference in the VTI variation [i.e.: % change after a fluid challenge of 250 mL, or a passive leg-raising test] obtained by the minimally-trained operators and that obtained by experts.
To quantify the reproducibility of LVOT VTI measurements between minimally trained operators and experts.
Correlation of the measure of the VTI variation before and after a fluid challenge of 250 mL or after a passive leg-raising test between the minimally trained operators and the experts.
Correlation of the measures of the VTI variation before and after a fluid challenge of 250 mL or after a passive leg-raising test between the minimally-trained operators and the experts will be analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and its associated 95% confidence interval. Pearson and Spearmann correlation coefficients will also be calculated.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead sponsor
Philips Healthcare
Collaborator
UltraSight
Collaborator