About this trial
A substantial body of basic and clinical research has demonstrated the protective effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in ischemic stroke. While these clinical studies support the safety of RIC, the neuroprotective benefits of RIC in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients lack robust evidence due to small sample sizes, heterogeneous RIC protocols, and variability in the severity of neurological deficits among study populations. Our recent multicenter randomized clinical trial, the RICAMIS study, investigated the efficacy of RIC in patients with acute moderate ischemic stroke. The results showed that RIC administered within 48 hours of onset significantly improved 90-day neurological outcomes in patients with moderate stroke severity. It is well established that anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and posterior circulation stroke (PCS) differ in multiple aspects, including anatomical structure, collateral circulation, blood supply, clinical manifestations, prognosis, ischemic tolerance time, and treatment response. For instance, compared to the anterior circulation, the posterior circulation has poorer collateral circulation, a higher proportion of stroke etiologies attributed to atherosclerosis, and longer ischemic tolerance time. Consequently, intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy may offer a more extended therapeutic time window for PCS patients. A prespecified subgroup analysis of the RICAMIS study revealed that patients with PCS derived greater benefit from RIC than those with ACS. However, this finding requires further validation through prospective studies, as prior research has never specifically examined the efficacy of RIC in PCS patients.
Based on the above discussion, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of RIC in patients with acute moderate PCS.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age ≥18 years;
Time from onset to treatment: ≤48 hours;
Posterior circulation ischemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI, including patients who have received intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy;
NIHSS score at randomization: 6-16, with an item 1a (level of consciousness) score of 0-1;
Disqualifiers
intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage;
Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg despite antihypertensive therapy);
Subclavian artery stenosis ≥ 50% or subclavian steal syndrome;
Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm;
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
remote ischemic conditioning
DeviceThe cuff of the remote ischemic conditioning device was placed on both upper arms (at the same position as blood pressure measurement) and inflated to 200 mmHg. The treatment protocol consisted of 5 cycles of 5-minute inflation followed by 5-minute deflation, performed twice daily. The treatment duration was 8-12 consecutive days.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
proportion of excellent outcome
Excellent outcome is defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1. mRS ranges from 0-6, higher scores mean a worse outcome
Secondary outcomes
proportion of favorable outcome
Favorable outcome is defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. mRS ranges from 0-6, higher scores mean a worse outcome
Distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS scores range from 0 to 6. mRS ranges from 0-6, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
change in National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS)
NIHSS scores range 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater stroke severity
change in National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS)
NIHSS scores range 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater stroke severity
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.