REpeat Intervention For Failed Surgical BioProsthEtic AorTic Valves (REPEAT)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorHeart Center Leipzig - University Hospital

About this trial

The overall hypothesis is that redo aortic valve replacement (rAVR) is superior to valve-invalve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) for the composite endpoint of freedom from all-cause mortality, all-cause stroke, myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for heart failure or aortic valve re-intervention at 5 years.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Indication for repeat intervention for failed surgical aortic bioprosthesis due to structural valve deterioration (SVD; prosthesis stenosis and/or transprosthetic insufficiency);

Low to intermediate surgical risk (i.e., Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) predicted risk of mortality of < 8%);

Age > 18 and < 75 years;

Both rAVR and ViV-TAVR are judged to be reasonable options based on evaluation by the local Heart Team

Disqualifiers

Multiple valvular disease requiring surgical intervention;

High-risk coronary anatomy resulting in increased risk of coronary obstruction following ViV-TAVR prosthesis deployment;

Complex coronary artery disease requiring revascularization (unprotected left main coronary artery, Syntax score > 32) and Heart Team assessment that optimal revascularization cannot be performed;

Failing valve with evidence of bacterial endocarditis or evidence of non-structural valve deterioration (e.g., paravalvular leak, thrombosis);

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Transfemoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation

    Procedure/Surgery

    The intervention under investigation is transcatheter \- preferably transfemoral - ViV-TAVR applied for degenerated surgical aortic bioprostheses with an indication for re-intervention in patients at low-to intermediate surgical risk. An aortic transcatheter bioprosthesis is implanted into the degenerated surgical aortic bioprosthesis.

  • Surgical redo aortic valve replacement

    Procedure/Surgery

    Surgical rAVR serves as the control intervention. The patient's degenerated aortic bioprosthesis is replaced using conventional open-heart surgery.

Treatment groups

890 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ViV-TAVRExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: redoAVRActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The primary endpoint will be a composite endpoint including all-cause mortality, all-cause stroke, myocardial infarction, and re-hospitalization for heart failure or aortic valve reintervention at 5 years.

based on VARC-3

Time frame
5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Each of the individual components of the primary composite endpoint

based on VARC-3

Time frame
5 years
2

Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3)1-based conduction disturbances and arrhythmia

VARC-3-based conduction disturbances and arrhythmia (qualitative variable; yes or no)

Time frame
5 years
3

Wound and bleeding complications (based on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium class 3b-5)

BARC-based bleeding complications (qualitative ordinal variable; 3b-5)

Time frame
5 years
4

New York Heart Association classification III or IV

New York Heart Association classification (qualitative variable; III or IV)

Time frame
5 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital

Lead sponsor

University of Leipzig

Collaborator

Helios Health Institute GmbH

Collaborator