About this trial
Majority of previous classifications based on two-dimensional images to analyze these complicated 3-D fractures. Small or delicate changes in rotation and positioning can result to considerable disagreement in the interpretation of standard radiographs. Therefore, a classification system which had a better reliability and reproducibility for the fractures is warranted and helpful for orthopedic surgeons. Furthermore, CT and 3-D CT construction images with high resolution give a much clearer view of the pattern of proximal humeral fractures. Edelson proposed a new three-dimensional classification for fractures of the proximal humerus. The results concluded that it was a useful in classifying these injuries with reasonable interobserver reliability.
It could be hypothesized that patients with proximal humeral fractures would benefit from this 3D classification, but there is a scarcity of application of the classification in large samples. T
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Whole imaging data ;
Clear record of demographic data;
Three dimensional construction with mimics (with CT of B30);
Patients older than 17 years with displaced PHF occurring less than 3 weeks before allocation and treatment.
Disqualifiers
Patients with the presence of neurological disease (syringomyelia and);
Open fractures;
Pathological fracture (other than osteoporotic);
Not a resident in the hospital catchment area
Trial population
proximal humeral fractures without Pathological fracture
Trial design
Cohort
Retrospective
Treatments tested in this trial
without intervention, just retrospectively review the data about patients
Other interventionwithout intervention
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
classification based on Edelson classifications
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.