Respiratory Stabilization in Chronic Acidosis Before Bronchofiberoscopy & Non-Invasive Ventilation Effectivenes

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMedical University of Silesia

About this trial

Bronchofiberoscopy (FOB) is a minimally invasive and safe procedure performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. FOB frequently impairs respiratory function, which may lead to possible exacerbation of respiratory failure.

Currently, the most frequent respiratory support is passive oxygen therapy, but non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are increasingly attempted, however the optimal setting and indications for NIV and HFNC in patients undergoing FOB with respiratory acidosis, haven't been determined yet.

Methods:

The study protocol describes a prospective, multicenter, two- armed randomized controlled trial (RCT).

The investigators aim to study two patients groups, based on FOB indications and the type of respiratory acidosis:

1\) Diagnostic FOB; patients with chronic respiratory acidosis (pH ≥7.35; pCO2 \> 45mmHg and/or HCO3- \>27 mmol/l);

1. randomized to: passive oxygen, NIV, HFNC; 2. total number of participants: 210

Randomization:

two-step randomization (1st randomization :a or b; 2nd randomization: i- iii method of respiratory support):

a. Stabilization of respiratory parameters before FOB (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- \>27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC iii. Passive oxygen therapy b. FOB right away (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 \>45 mmHg; HCO3- \> 27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC

Before FOB, both groups will undergo arterial blood gas analysis (ABG). During FOB there will be a continuous monitoring of vital signs as in: SpO2, FiO2, TcCO2, ECG, and Heart Rate. After FOB, the investigators are going to perform another ABG, mark endpoints, and complications, if any arise.

Results:

Based on the selected endpoints, or any complication related to FOB the investigators hope to determine which of the respiratory methods: passive oxygen, NIV, HFNC or IMV provides the best support, leading to a lower number of complications and overall a better tolerance of FOB by the patient. Additionally, our aim is to find the optimal settings for NIV and HFNC in both studied groups.

Conclusions:

The results of this study are going to assess the need and the role of the optimal respiratory support method among patients with respiratory acidosis, leading to a shorter time from admission to diagnosis, better tolerance during the procedure, quicker recovery after procedure.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient who signed a written informed consent to participate in the study,

pCO2 > 45 mmHg and/or HCO3- > 27 mmol/l but pH ≥ 7.35 in a blood gas test performed immediately before qualification for bronchoscopy.

Disqualifiers

Lack of written informed consent of the subject to participate in the research project,

Coronary artery disease CCS III/IV,

Hemodynamic failure, use of pressor amines, myocardial infarction in the last 2 weeks without PCI treatment, unstable angina pectoris, severe arrhythmias - especially ventricular,

Pneumothorax not secured with drainage,

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support method

    Device

    The aim of this project is to assess the safety, indications and contrindications to perform bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patient with chronic respiratory acidosis with the use of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC). In addition we want to determine the extent to which the usage of respiratory support during bronchofiberoscopy (BF) will help to avoid complications such as hypoxemia, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, deterioration of gas exchange and hemodynamic instability, as well as intubation.

  • Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method

    Device

    The aim of this project is to assess the safety, indications and contrindications to perform bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patient with chronic respiratory acidosis with the use of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC). In addition we want to determine the extent to which the usage of respiratory support during bronchofiberoscopy (BF) will help to avoid complications such as hypoxemia, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, deterioration of gas exchange and hemodynamic instability, as well as intubation.

Treatment groups

210 Participants
are divided into 5 treatment groups
Group A: No respiratory stabilization before FOB: HFNCActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: No respiratory stabilization before FOB: NIVActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Respiratory stabilization before FOB: HFNCActive comparator 1 intervention
Group D: Respiratory stabilization before FOB: NIVActive comparator 1 intervention
Group E: Respiratory stabilization before FOB: passive oxygenNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

HFNC allows to perform a safe diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg; pH 7.35-7.45; HCO3- >27mmol/L)

The investiagors aim to determine if using NIV or HFNC instead of passive oxygen support during the procedure in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2\>45mmHg, pH 7.35-7.45, HCO3- \>27 mmol/L) results in better respiratory stabiliziation during the procedure without the need to escalate respiratory support therapy during and after the procedure, marking endpoints such as: * Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation \>5% for more than 30 seconds, * PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 \>10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, * PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * pH before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Need to extend HNFC therapy after FOB - \[time in minutes\], * Need to escalate HFNC therapy -\> NIV, NIV -\> intubation,

Time frame
During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
2

NIV allows to perform a safe diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg; pH 7.35-7.45; HCO3- >27mmol/L)

The investiagors aim to determine if using NIV instead of passive oxygen support during the procedure in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2\>45mmHg, pH 7.35-7.45, HCO3- \>27 mmol/L) results in better respiratory stabiliziation during the procedure without the need to escalate respiratory support therapy during and after the procedure, marking endpoints such as: * Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation \>5% for more than 30 seconds, * PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 \>10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, * PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * pH before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Need to extend NIV therapy after FOB - \[time in minutes\], * Need to escalate NIV therapy -\> intubation,

Time frame
During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
3

Optimal settings for HFNC in patients with chronic hypercapnia undergoing a diagnostic FOB

Primarily the devices will be set to: \- HFNC: flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, During FOB all needed changes in settings for a safe procedures will be marked, if the need for that arises. Measurment of parameters for the optimal setting choice: Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation \>5% for more than 30 seconds, PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 \>10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, A comaparison of BGA before and after the procedure will allow to determine if those settings and the method itself performs well.

Time frame
During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
4

Optimal settings for NIV in patients with chronic hypercapnia undergoing a diagnostic FOB

Primarily the device will be set to: NIV will be conducted in ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, During FOB all needed changes in settings for a safe procedures will be marked, if the need for that arises. Measurment of parameters for the optimal setting choice: Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation \>5% for more than 30 seconds, PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 \>10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, A comaparison of BGA before and after the procedure will allow to determine if those settings and the method itself performs well.

Time frame
During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)

Secondary outcomes

1

NIV vs HFNC, is one better then the other to support a diagnostic BF in patients with chronic hypercapnia

Secondary outcome, provided the primary outcomes show a good tolerance of both methods is the comparison of respiratory paramethers and analysis of NIV and HFNC, and finding a new standard for the procedure in patients with chronic hypercapnia * PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation \>5% for more than 30 seconds * Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2 during the procedure, increase in PCO2 \>10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the procedure, * PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * pH before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: