Restoring Hand Function in Patients with Tetraplegia by Intraneural Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves

ConditionTetraplegics
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-70
SponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

About this trial

The aim of the clinical investigation is to evaluate the feasibility, in terms of efficacy and safety, of a prosthetic system, the Regrasp 1 system, based on intraneural stimulation via TIME- 4H electrodes, as an aid device for restoring hand function in tetraplegic patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Men or women aged between 18 and 70.

Spinal cord injury at the C5-6 level, with complete motor paralysis (ASIA A or ASIA B).

Chronic injury (> 6 months), with stable clinical condition.

Disqualifiers

Systemic infections.

Central and/or peripheral nervous system comorbidity.

Reduced joint flexibility.

Severe spasticity of the upper limb (mAS 3).

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Electrical stimulation

    Device

    Electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves for the recovery of hand function in tetraplegic patients of fundamental importance in improving quality of life.

Treatment groups

2 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Restoring hand function in patients with tetraplegia by intraneural stimulation of peripheral nervesExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

efficacy of REGRASP device, regarding muscle selectivity

The muscle selectivity index will be obtained by intraneural stimulation with a TIME-4H astimulator. Single stimulation pulses (1 Hz) will be applied from each active site of each implanted TIME-4H electrode. Simultaneously, electromyographic (EMG) signals of the flexor and extensor muscles of the forearm and hand, innervated by the median and radial nerves, respectively, will be recorded. For the EMG acquisitions we will use the CE-marked Sessantaquattro+ system. The peak-to-peak value of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP), evoked by each stimulation pulse, will be calculated and normalised with respect to the maximum value obtained for each muscle during the overall experimental session. These normalised levels of muscle activation will be used to define the relationship between current intensity and muscle recruitment for each active site and so to calculate an index of muscle selectivity.

Time frame
from baseline to follow-up at month 6
2

efficacy of REGRASP device, regarding muscle functional selectivity

To assess functional selectivity, bursts of stimulation, with a duration of 0.5-1 sec, will be applied from each active site of each implanted TIME-4H. Evoked movements will be assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. In addition, we will characterise evoked movements in terms of muscle activity patterns by recording the EMG activity of the muscles with the Sessantaquattro+ system, and in terms of kinematic patterns (amplitude and velocity) and generated force. The same experiments will then be performed by modulating the frequency of the stimulation bursts (in the range 10-100 Hz) while keeping the amplitude fixed at a value capable of generating functional movements. Thus, we will evaluate the possibility of gradually controlling the amplitude and force of the movement by adjusting the different stimulation parameters.

Time frame
from baseline to follow-up at month 6
3

Muscle fatigue

To measure muscle fatigue, experiments will be conducted in which stimulation trains will be applied for approximately 20-30 seconds. At the same time, the EMG activity of the forearm and hand muscles and the grip force generated will be recorded. Some indices of muscle fatigue found in the literature will then be calculated, which measure, for example, the rate at which muscle strength decreases over time. The values obtained will be compared with those measured during voluntary contractions and with those induced by other stimulation modalities, such as FES with surface electrodes.

Time frame
from baseline to follow-up at month 6
4

Functional recovery analysis

Restoration of hand function, in particular grasping movements and manipulation of objects, when the patient is assisted by the neuroprosthetic system. This will be assessed using four different tests with related score: * the Grasp and Release test, awarded on the basis of the number of objects the patient is able to manipulate and the number of repetitions they are able to perform in a specific time interval; * ADL test, used to evaluate the performance of the neuroprosthetic system when used during activities of daily living; * GRASSP, a measure of clinical impairment that incorporates three vital domains of upper limb function: sensation, strength and grip; * SCIM, a disability scale developed to specifically assess the ability of spinal cord injury patients to perform basic activities of daily living independently.

Time frame
from baseline to follow-up at month 6

Secondary outcomes

1

to evaluate possible plastic changes in the central nervous system induced by the use of the neuroprosthetic system.

Somatosensory cortical mapping of the paralysed hand will be performed using somatosensory evoked potentials (PESs). The median and ulnar nerves will be stimulated using bipolar surface electrodes at a frequency of 1 Hz. The amplitude of the response will be measured automatically by the BE Plus PRO system, as the difference between the peak potential and the signal baseline, for each electrode.

Time frame
from baseline to follow-up at month 6

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

Lead sponsor

Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: