About this trial
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted minimally invasive treatment versus conservative treatment in elderly patients with FFP1-2 fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eligible patients will be stratified according to FFP classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or standardized conservative treatment. Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, functional recovery, fracture progression, venous thromboembolism events, complications, and healthcare resource utilization. The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing treatment strategies in elderly patients with pelvic fragility fractures.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Fixation
Procedure/SurgeryRobot assisted minimally invasive fixation is performed using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement for stabilization of pelvic fragility fractures.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain severity.
Majeed Pelvic Function Score
Secondary outcomes
EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level Questionnaire
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA)
Fracture Progression and Healing
Assessment of fracture healing, secondary displacement, and FFP classification progression using pelvic CT.
complication
Assessment of complication events during follow up.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Junbo Liang
Lead sponsor
Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University
Sponsor institution
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: