Robotic Versus Video-assisted Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Lung Surgery
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-85
SponsorThe Second Hospital of Shandong University
About this trial
To compare the safety/efficacy of the robotic-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (RAL/S) with the video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection.
Video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection is divided into uniport group and multiple- port group.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
good cardio- pulmonary function to tolerate surgery;
minimaly invasive surgery for lobectomy or segmentectomy or sleeve lobectomy;
Disqualifiers
cardio- pulmonary function is not good enough to tolerate surgery;
huge tumor or extensive adhesion in thoracic cavity.
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
robotic surgery
Procedure/Surgeryminimally invasive surgery using the Davinci robotic system
uniport surgery
Procedure/SurgeryVATS minimally invasive surgery under the uniportal status
multiple- port surgery
Procedure/SurgeryVATS minimally invasive surgery under the multiple- port status
Treatment groups
800 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groupsGroup A: robotic surgery groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: uniport surgery groupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: multiple- port surgery groupActive comparator 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
mortality
incidence rate
Time frame
30 days after surgery2
conversion rate to open surgery
incidence rate
Time frame
during surgery3
postoperative complications
incidence rate
Time frame
within 7 days after surgery4
operation time
minutes
Time frame
within 180 minutesSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov