S1703 Serum Tumor Marker Directed Disease Monitoring in Patients With Hormone Receptor Positive Her2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSWOG Cancer Research Network

About this trial

This randomized research trial studies how well serum tumor marker directed disease monitoring works in monitoring patients with hormone receptor positive Her2 negative breast cancer that has spread to other places in the body. Using markers to prompt when scans should be ordered may be as good as the usual approach to monitoring disease.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

STEP 1 REGISTRATION

Patients must have a diagnosis of hormone receptor positive (estrogen receptor positive [ER+] and/or progesterone receptor positive [PR+]), HER-2 negative, metastatic (M1) breast cancer and must be receiving or plan to receive first-line systemic treatment for metastatic disease. (Systemic treatment is any treatment meant to treat the whole body such as endocrine therapy +/- targeted therapy +/- chemotherapy).

NOTE: Participants are eligible if they have either de-novo metastatic breast cancer and/or recurrent breast cancer from an earlier stage that is now metastatic

Patients must be registered to step 1 between 14 days prior to and 60 days after start of first-line systemic treatment for metastatic disease

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Usual care disease monitoring

    Other intervention

    Imaging and serum tumor markers are at the discretion of the treating physician (however imaging must be performed at least every 12 weeks).

  • Serum Tumor Marker directed disease monitoring

    Other intervention

    Serum tumor markers every 4-8 weeks without imaging

  • Quality-of-Life Assessment

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Anxiety Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

Treatment groups

739 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (usual care)Active comparator 3 interventions
Group B: Arm II (serum tumor directed disease monitoring)Experimental treatment 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Assessment of whether patients monitored with STMDDM have non-inferior overall survival compared with patients monitored with usual care

The assessment of whether patients monitored with STMDDM have non-inferior overall survival compared with patients monitored with usual care will be based on multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for intervention assignment (intention-to-treat) and the stratification factor (bone only versus visceral disease). If at the time of final analysis the study shows notably fewer events than anticipated, extended follow-up will be examined for its potential to allow examination of the primary endpoint with full power.

Time frame
Up to 312 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes

1

Cumulative direct healthcare costs (in the United States) of patients monitored with STMDDM versus usual care

The comparison of direct healthcare costs (in the US) by arm will be based on a multivariable linear regression, adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics.

Time frame
Up to 48 weeks after randomization
2

Assessment of anxiety of patients monitored with STMDDM compared to patients monitored with usual care

Patient anxiety will be measured at baseline and at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 102 after randomization using the State-Trait Anxiety inventory Scale (STAI-S). Differences in anxiety by arm will be evaluated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures controlling for the baseline score and stratification factor as covariates. No direction of effect will be assumed, implying two-sided testing.

Time frame
Up to 102 weeks after randomization
3

Assessment of quality of life of patients monitored with STMDDM versus patients monitored with usual care

Patient quality of life (QOL) will be measured at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, and 102 after randomization using the PROMIS-29. Differences in QOL by arm will be evaluated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures, controlling for the baseline score and stratification factor as covariates. No direction of effect will be assumed, implying two-sided testing.

Time frame
Up to 102 weeks after randomization

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

SWOG Cancer Research Network

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator