Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Dysfunction

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorOdense University Hospital

About this trial

A multi-center double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.

The patients will be randomized into two groups.

To investigate the efficacy of SNM to improve the key bladder diary variables compared to placebo (i.e. sham) for patients with MS having refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).

After first step SNM-procedure and a 3-4 weeks test period patients with more than 50% improvement in the key bladder diary variables will have the IPG implanted. After a month of optimization patients will into two groups: IPG ON or IPG OFF.

Period of randomization: four months. Number anticipated to be included: 60 patients

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (nLUTD) defined by visual analogue scale on treatment satisfaction ranging from 0 to 100 (100 means maximal satisfaction with the current treatment). All patients indicating satisfaction less than 50 are considered non-responders/having refractory overactive bladder (OAB) to current treatment

No effect of medical treatment defined by antimuscarinics, beta3-agonist and alpha-blocker.

Patients having refractory nLUTD who intend to try SNM for relief of their symptoms

Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) < 5 and no progression of neurological disease within 6 months

Disqualifiers

EDSS > 5, neurological disease with severe progression within the last 6 months and/or unable to manage the electronic devices

Age < 18 years

Any other urological pathology but nLUTD

Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial cystitis

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Turning ON the neuromodulator

    Device

    IPG on

  • Turning OFF the neuromodulator

    Device

    IPG OFF

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: IPG turned ONActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: IPG turned OFFPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Success of SNM for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction

Success is defined as improvement of at least 50% in the key bladder diary variables, i.e. number of voids and/or number of leakages, post void residual volumen, compared to the baseline values using BLADDER DIARY for three days before inclusion and at evaluation.

Time frame
Six months
2

Male bladder function

Male lower urinary tract symptoms (MLUTS) by standard International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)-MLUTS 10/06. Scale ranges from 0 to 44 points. Higher score indicate greater impact of individual symptoms for the patient. Changes will be compared to basal data.

Time frame
Six months
3

Female bladder function

Female lower urinary tract symptoms (FLUTS) by standard questionnaire ICIQ-FLUTS 12/07. Scale ranges from 0 to 48 points. Higher score indicate greater impact of individual symptoms for the patient. Changes will be compared to basal data.

Time frame
Six months

Secondary outcomes

1

Changes in bladder volume

Change in bladder volume measured in ml before and after implantation of implantable pulse generator for sacral neuromodulation

Time frame
Six months
2

Changes in bladder sensation Mangler

Changes in bladder sensation measured in ml before and after implantation of implantable pulse generator for sacral neuromodulation

Time frame
Six months
3

Bowel function

Bowel function by standard questionnaire ICIQ-B (04/08). Scale ranges from 0 to 75 points. Higher score indicate greater impact of individual symptoms for the patient. Changes will be compared to basal data.

Time frame
Eight months
4

Male sexual function

Male sexual function by standard questionnaire (07/05). Scale ranges from 0 to 12 points. Higher score indicate greater impact of individual symptoms for the patient. Changes will be compared to basal data.

Time frame
Six months

Other outcomes

1

Adverse events

Rate of adverse events evaluated by the Medical Device Coordination Group, (MDCG)-202010/1, safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under the Regulation (EU) 2017/745

Time frame
Six months
2

Global assessment scale

5 point Likert scale evaluated by: Very satisfied - satisfied - neutral - unsatisfied - very unsatisfied

Time frame
Six months
3

Implantation Characteristics

The lowest stimulation value in mA will be monitored and number of the re-programming

Time frame
Six months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Odense University Hospital

Lead sponsor

University of Copenhagen

Collaborator