Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Versus Electrocautery Dilator for EUS-guided Biliary Drainage (MED-BD)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNational Taiwan University Hospital

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to investigate the likelihood of post-dilation bleeding using mechanical or electrocautery dilation. We hypothesized that the risk of bleeding is lower in the mechanical group.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Failed ERCP

The papilla is inaccessible owing to a surgically altered anatomy or gastric outlet obstruction

Contraindications for PTCD such as ascites and possibility of self-tube removal

Disqualifiers

Patients younger than 18 years old

Cancer infiltration of the gastric/duodenal wall within the planned puncture route

Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy

Patients with unmanageable ascites

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage

    Procedure/Surgery

    Skilled endosonographers performed EUS-BD with patients under conscious sedation by intravenous medication. All patients were given intravenous antibiotics prophylactically. A therapeutic curved linear array echoendoscope is positioned in the stomach with carbon dioxide insufflation. Standard 19G fine needles are used to puncture the dilated left intrahepatic bile duct or commo bile duct. Bile juice aspiration with 20ml syringe was performed to confirm intraductal puncture. After contrast medium injection, an insulated guidewire (0.025 inch VisiGlide2; Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) is advanced antegradely. Dilation of the needle tract is initially performed with a diathermic sheath (6Fr Cyst-Gastro set; Endoflex, Voerde, Germany) or an ultra-tapered mechanical dilator (7Fr ES Dilator; Zeon Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan) according to randomization result. If needed, additional dilation can be attempted with dilating balloon. Finally, the dedicated plastic stent or partially cover

Treatment groups

64 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Mechanical dilatorExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Electrocautery dilatorActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Bleeding

hematemesis and/or melena or hemoglobin drop over 2g/dL, needed blood transfusion, endoscopic hemostasis, radiological intervention or surgery

Time frame
From randomization to four weeks after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Tract dilation success

tract dilation was regarded as successful when the maximum diameter portion of the first dilator into the bile duct.

Time frame
From randomization to successful tract dilation using the first device (success), to using other dilation devices (fail) or to procedure termination (fail)
2

Final procedure success

a successful deployment of a stent in the intended location

Time frame
at the end of the procedure
3

Procedural duration

the time elapsed between puncture of the intrahepatic duct and completion of deployment of stent

Time frame
between puncture of the intrahepatic duct and completion of deployment of stent
4

Clinical success

a decrease in bilirubin within 30 days to \< 75 % of levels before EUS-BD

Time frame
From enrollment to 30 days after procedure

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch

Collaborator

Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Collaborator

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation

Collaborator

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Collaborator

China Medical University Hospital

Collaborator

Chung Shan Medical University

Collaborator

Taitung Mackay Memorial Hospital

Collaborator

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Collaborator

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Collaborator

Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

Collaborator