Sapien 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Young Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients From China

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age50-70
SponsorXijing Hospital

About this trial

Safety, effectiveness and durability of Sapien 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in young aortic valve stenosis patients from China:A multi-center, retrospective and prospective, single arm, observational study

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

50 years of age or older but ≤70 years old at time of consent.

Tricuspid aortic valve stenosis and type-1 bicuspid aortic valve anatomy confirmed by MDCT.

The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.

Adequate iliofemoral access and acceptable level of vessel calcification and tortuosity for safe device implant.

Disqualifiers

Any of the following: a. no calcification; b. challenging calcification based on physician's experience and discretion (Case Review Board would decide whether to exclude challenging calcification cases).

Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid valve, congenital Type-0 or Type-2 bicuspid valve, or quadricuspid valve.

Severe femoral, iliac or aortic atherosclerosis, calcification, coarctation, aneurysm or tortuosity, which prevents transfemoral TAVR.

Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days), with evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with acute myocardial ischemia.

Trial population

Young (50\~70 years old) Chinese patients with severe symptomatic AS, including Type-1 bicuspid population

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Other

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

    Procedure/Surgery

    TAVR procedure was performed according to standard clinical practice. Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device and successful retrieval of the delivery system will be attempted. Vascular access site will be through transfemoral on the basis of pre-procedural evaluation of access site vessel. The procedure will be performed under local or general anesthesia and per clinical practice standard.

Treatment groups

450 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: 300 retrospectively enrolled patients1 intervention
Group B: 150 prospectively enrolled patients1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

All-cause mortality

The primary end point is the 5 year all-cause mortality

Time frame
At 5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and rehospitalization

The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, rehospitalization (procedure, valve and heart failure related) at 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years

Time frame
At 30 days, 1, 3, 5 years
2

The composite of device success

The composite of device success at 30 days comprising the following: freedom from mortality, successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system, correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication, intended performance of the valve (mean gradient \<20 mmHg, peak velocity \<3 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≥0.25, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation), according to the VARC-3 definition

Time frame
At 30 days
3

The durability performance of Sapien 3

The durability performance of Sapien 3 at 1, 3, 5 years: bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD, including SVD, non-SVD, endocarditis and thrombosis), moderate or severe hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD), bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) according to the VARC-3 definition, EOA/mean gradient (MG) change over follow up

Time frame
At 1, 3, 5 years
4

Annular rupture

The incidence of annular rupture

Time frame
At 1 day of discharge

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Xijing Hospital

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Collaborator

Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China

Collaborator

West China Hospital

Collaborator