About this trial
The purpose of this research is to measure the acceptance of a resistance breathing intervention and to assess whether it produces physiological and subjective effects in a laboratory setting.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Be at least 18 years old
Be currently enrolled in a college or university
Be able to read, speak, and comprehend English
Be able and willing to complete a 60-minute study involving heart rate monitoring, survey completion, training, a stress test, and device utilization
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Resistance Breathing Device
DeviceThe AIRpen is a multifunctional stress management tool that helps users engage in diaphragmatic breathing at differing resistance levels, as well as other common stress relieving behaviors such as fidgeting
Electronic Resistance Breathing Device
DeviceThe Smart AIRpen functions just as the original AIRpen device and has been augmented with sensors to measure use patterns to determine whether the AIRpen is being used for fidgeting or breathing.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Device Acceptability as Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
The AIM measure is designed to assess the acceptability of a intervention, and has been adapted in relation to the AIRpen. Participants rate statements related to their usage and experience of the AIRpen and AIRpen website, with ratings ranging from "Completely Disagree" (1), to "Completely Agree" (5). Higher scores indicate higher acceptability of the intervention.
Device Usability as Measured by a Modified Version of the System Usability Scale (SUS)
The System Usability Scale is a 10-item measure that address the usability and learnability of a system. The SUS has been modified to reflect the AIRpen intervention. Statements are ranked on a Likert scale for 1-5, with 1 indicating "Strongly Disagree" and 5 indicating "Strongly Agree". Raw scores are converted into a final score that ranges from 0-100, with a larger score indicating greater usability.
Secondary outcomes
Perceived Stress as Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS_10)
The Perceived Stress Scale is a measure used to assess perceptions of recent stress. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Physiological Stress as Assessed with Heart Rate Monitoring
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Livotion, LLC
Lead sponsor
Purdue University
Collaborator
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Collaborator