Scenario-Based Hybrid Simulation for Patient Education in Assisted Reproductive Treatment

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorDuzce University

About this trial

This study aims to evaluate the effect of a scenario-based hybrid simulation designed for patient education in assisted reproductive treatment on nursing students' anxiety, effective communication, self-efficacy, knowledge, and skills. The study will include third-year nursing students enrolled in the Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Nursing course. Participants will receive six weeks of theoretical and video-based education followed by two scenario-based hybrid simulation sessions conducted four weeks apart. Outcomes will be assessed at four time points (T0, T1, T2, and T3). A preliminary application is planned with 6 students, followed by the main study with 30 students.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Being a third-year undergraduate nursing student.

Being enrolled in the Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Nursing course.

Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study.

Having no previous experience with scenario-based or hybrid simulation training on assisted reproductive treatment.

Disqualifiers

Not completing the simulation sessions.

Not completing any of the required data collection assessments.

Withdrawing from the study voluntarily.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Scenario-Based Hybrid Simulation

    Behavioral

    Participants will receive six weeks of structured theoretical and video-based education on assisted reproductive technologies and nursing, followed by two scenario-based hybrid simulation sessions conducted four weeks apart. Each simulation will involve a standardized female patient, a standardized male partner, and an injection model. Students will provide education on assisted reproductive treatment stages, the role of the male partner, gonadotropin medication administration, and risk factors and signs and symptoms of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Each simulation will be followed by a structured debriefing session.

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Scenario-Based Hybrid SimulationExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Assisted Reproductive Technologies Knowledge Score

Change in students' knowledge regarding assisted reproductive technologies, assessed using the researcher-developed Assisted Reproductive Technologies Knowledge Test. The knowledge test was developed by the researchers based on the relevant literature and study objectives. The content validity of the test was evaluated through expert review, and a preliminary application was conducted with students from a different group who were not included in the main study. Item difficulty analyses were performed based on the preliminary application to evaluate the appropriateness and discriminatory characteristics of the test items. Higher scores indicate a higher level of knowledge regarding assisted reproductive technologies.

Time frame
At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Effective Communication Skills

Effective communication skills will be assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 using the Effective Communication Skills Scale. The scale consists of 34 items and five subdimensions: ego-enhancing language, active listening, self-awareness/self-disclosure, empathy, and use of "I" language. It uses a 5-point Likert-type response format, with higher scores indicating better effective communication skills.Cronbach alfa value is 0.93 for the full scale, and 0.85, 0.90, 0.78, 0.91, and 0.53 for the Ego Supportive Language, Active-Participative Listening, Self-recognition/Self-disclosure, Empathy, and I-language sub-dimensions, respectively.

Time frame
At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
2

Change in Anxiety Level

Anxiety will be assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The STAI is a 40-item self-report instrument consisting of two subscales: State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety, with 20 items in each subscale. Items are rated on a 4-point response scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. The Turkish version of the STAI has been adapted and validated for use in Turkish populations. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were reported as 0.92 for state anxiety and 0.87 for trait anxiety.

Time frame
At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
3

Change in Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy will be assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 using the Student Self-Efficacy Scale. The scale consists of 10 items and has a single-factor structure. It is a self-report measure developed to assess students' perceived self-efficacy. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy. The Turkish version of the scale has demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability among undergraduate nursing students.The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.81, while corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.45 to 0.56.

Time frame
At baseline (Day 0), after 6 weeks of theoretical and video-based education (Week 6), immediately after the first simulation session (Week 8), and immediately after the second simulation session, conducted 4 weeks after the first simulation (Week 12).
4

Change in Simulation Skill Performance

Simulation skill performance will be assessed during the first and second simulation sessions (T2 and T3) using the researcher-developed Skill Assessment Form. The form was developed based on the study objectives and relevant literature, and its content was evaluated through expert review. The form evaluates students' performance in communicating with the female patient and male partner, explaining the stages of assisted reproductive treatment and the role of the male partner, preparing and administering gonadotropin medication, and providing education on medication administration. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Time frame
Skills will be assessed at two time points: immediately after the first simulation (Week 8) and immediately after the second simulation (Week 12), with a 4-week interval between assessments.

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: