Screw-Integrated vs Traditional Cervical Cages in ACDF for Degenerative Disc Disease

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorAssiut University

About this trial

This study is a prospective, comparative clinical trial conducted at Assiut University Hospitals to evaluate the effectiveness of two different interbody fusion devices in patients with Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (CDDD). The primary objective is to compare cervical cages with integrated screws against traditional stand-alone cervical cages during single or double-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF). While ACDF is the gold standard for CDDD, traditional cages can sometimes lead to complications like subsidence or incomplete fusion; integrated screw designs aim to provide immediate stability and reduce these risks.

Investigators will assess 40 patients over a 12-month follow-up period, focusing on primary outcomes of radiological interbody fusion using the Daniel Riew grading system.

Secondary outcomes include the maintenance of cervical alignment (Ishihara Index), change in segmental angles (Cobb's method), disc height restoration, and clinical improvements in pain and function measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). The study's rationale is to provide clearer evidence on whether screw-integrated cages offer superior radiological and clinical outcomes to help guide future surgical preferences

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged above 18 years old.

Clinical diagnosis of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD).

Single or double level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) confirmed by MRI

Failure of conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks.

Disqualifiers

Previous cervical spine surgery.

Mutli-level (more than double level) cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD).

Significant cervical instability requiring additional posterior fixation

Cervical trauma, fracture, or spinal infection.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • cervical cage with integrated screws

    Device

    Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) procedure performed using a cervical cage that features integrated screw fixation. This device provides immediate biomechanical stability without the need for an additional anterior plate

  • traditional standalone cervical cage

    Device

    Standard Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) procedure using a traditional standalone interbody fusion cage (without integrated screws). This serves as the control intervention to compare stability and fusion rates

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Screw-Integrated Cage GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Traditional Cage GroupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Radiological cervical interbody fusion.

Assessment of solid bone fusion at the operated level(s) using dynamic lateral cervical radiographs and graded according to the Daniel-Riew grading system (± CT when indicated)

Time frame
3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

1

Maintenance of cervical alignment

Measured by the Ishihara Cervical Lordosis Index on lateral cervical spine radiographs to evaluate the curvature of the neck.

Time frame
Preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
2

Change in segmental alignment at the operated level

Evaluation of the local kyphotic angle and disc angle measured by Cobb's method on radiographs

Time frame
preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively
3

Restoration and maintenance of intervertebral disc height

Measured as the mean of anterior and posterior disc heights on lateral radiographs to assess space restoration.

Time frame
Preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
4

Cage subsidence

Defined as a reduction in disc height on serial radiographs, indicating the cage sinking into the vertebral endplates.

Time frame
3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: