Segmental Decompression Versus Wide Decompression With Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40+
SponsorAssiut University

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to compare two different surgical techniques for treating degenerative lumbar canal stenosis, a condition where the lower spinal canal narrows and puts pressure on the spinal nerves. For patients who continue to experience significant back and leg pain after at least three months of non-surgical treatments, surgery is often recommended to relieve the pressure.

Currently, there is an ongoing debate among spine surgeons regarding the most effective surgical approach. This study will evaluate and compare the outcomes of two established methods:

1. Segmental Decompression Alone: A procedure focused purely on removing the bone and tissue that is pressing on the spinal nerves. 2. Wide Decompression with Fixation: A more extensive removal of compressive structures, combined with adding spinal hardware (pedicle screws and rods) to stabilize the spine.

Researchers will observe 56 patients over an 18-month period. The primary goal is to determine if one technique offers better functional recovery and pain relief than the other. Researchers will measure success by tracking changes in patients' daily physical function (using the Oswestry Disability Index), reductions in lower back and leg pain, improvements in walking distance, and the time it takes to perform the surgery.

Eligible participants are adult males and females over the age of 40 with symptomatic multilevel stenosis, provided their dynamic x-rays do not show existing spinal instability.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age greater than 40 years

Both males and females

Multilevel lumbar canal stenosis with failed routine conservative treatment at least 3 months

X-ray dynamic views of the lumbar spine showing no evidence of instability

Disqualifiers

Age less than 40 years

Recurrent cases and screw revision cases

Degenerative scoliosis

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Segmental Decompression

    Procedure/Surgery

    A surgical technique involving the targeted removal of compressive structures in the lumbar spine to relieve neurogenic claudication and leg pain, performed without the addition of spinal instrumentation or fusion.

  • Wide Decompression with Fixation

    Procedure/Surgery

    A surgical technique that combines extensive decompression of the lumbar canal with spinal instrumentation. This involves the application of pedicle screws and rods across varying segment lengths to provide stabilization to the affected spine.

Treatment groups

56 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Segmental Decompression AloneActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Wide Decompression with FixationActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Functional Recovery as Assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Functional disability will be quantified using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. The ODI is a validated index scored from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicates maximum possible disability. A decrease in the score from baseline indicates functional improvement and a better surgical outcome.

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperative

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: