Short-Term Nutritional Enhancement Combined With Health Education in Postoperative Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorXiaoqin Luo

About this trial

This clinical study aims to evaluate whether short-term personalized nutritional support, when combined with structured health education, can improve nutritional status, quality of life, and clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and many patients experience malnutrition and poor physical condition during treatment, which can negatively affect recovery and long-term survival.

In this multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial, approximately 360 postoperative CRC patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of four groups: (A) nutritional enhancement combined with health education, (B) health education alone, (C) nutritional enhancement alone, or (D) standard care (control group). Nutritional support will include individualized diet counseling and oral nutritional supplements tailored to each patient's needs. Health education will be delivered using an "Internet Plus" approach, including weekly educational videos and expert consultations focusing on nutrition, physical activity, and mental health.

The primary objectives are to determine whether these interventions can improve patients' short-term nutritional status and quality of life. Secondary outcomes include the impact of interventions on long-term survival, treatment-related side effects, patient adherence to nutrition recommendations, and psychological well-being.

This study will also investigate the biological mechanisms underlying the clinical effects by analyzing changes in the gut microbiome, blood-based metabolic profiles, and immune responses. Blood, stool, and tumor tissue samples will be collected and analyzed using advanced techniques, including untargeted metabolomics, metagenomics, and single-cell sequencing.

This trial is designed to provide evidence for the integration of nutritional strategies into routine cancer care, and to guide the development of more personalized, effective nutrition-based therapies for colorectal cancer patients. Participants will be followed for up to annually up to 5 years to evaluate both clinical outcomes and biological markers of response.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Signed informed consent

Age ≥ 18 years

Pathologically confirmed diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer

Mentally alert and capable of communication

Disqualifiers

Nutritional risk screening score of mPG-SGA < 2 or NRS-2002 < 3

Diagnosed with AIDS

History of organ transplantation

Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Personalized Oral Nutritional Supplementation

    Dietary supplement

    Participants receive individualized oral nutritional supplementation based on energy and protein requirements, calculated using the Harris-Benedict equation and body weight (1.2-1.5 g protein/kg/day). The supplement may include complete nutrition powder, whey protein powder, and compound multivitamins. The intervention is prescribed and monitored by a clinical nutrition team and adjusted every 3 days during the 14-day intervention phase. The goal is to ensure both energy and protein intake targets are met. Supplements are administered in addition to standard meals.

  • Personalized Parenteral Nutritional Supplementation

    Drug

    For participants unable to meet nutritional goals through oral intake, parenteral nutrition is administered intravenously. The formulation includes amino acids, glucose, lipids, electrolytes, trace elements, and vitamins. Dosages are aligned with those of the enteral nutrition group, ensuring a consistent intake of energy and protein (1.2-1.5 g/kg/day protein). Formulation and administration follow standardized hospital protocols and are supervised by the nutrition support team.

  • Structured Nutrition-Focused Health Education

    Behavioral

    Participants receive structured health education focused on nutrition, physical activity, and psychological well-being. The education is delivered over 14 days using a digital "Internet Plus" platform, featuring weekly videos, interactive Q\&A sessions, and guidance from a multidisciplinary nutrition support team. Educational content covers dietary recommendations, exercise safety, stress management, and post-treatment recovery strategies. Materials are updated weekly, and participants may access them remotely via smartphone or tablet. This intervention aims to improve nutrition knowledge, adherence, and health behavior change.

Treatment groups

360 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Nutritional Enhancement Plus Health EducationExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Health Education OnlyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Nutritional Enhancement OnlyExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group D: Standard Care (Control)No intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Nutritional Status Assessed by Modified Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (mPG-SGA)

Longitudinal assessment of nutritional status using the mPG-SGA, a validated tool composed of five sections (weight loss history, dietary intake, symptoms, function/activity, and age). Total scores range from 0 to ≥7 points, with higher scores indicating worse nutritional status. Patients will be classified as: 0-2 = Normal 3-6 = Mild malnutrition ≥7 = Moderate to severe malnutrition.

Time frame
Baseline, after the intervention, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention; annually up to 5 years
2

Change in Global Health Status Score on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Assessment of patients' perceived overall health status using the global health subscale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better global quality of life.

Time frame
Baseline, after the intervention, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention; annually up to 5 years
3

Change in Symptom Scores on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Assessment of symptom burden including fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulty using symptom subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Each symptom is scored separately from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse symptom severity.

Time frame
Baseline, after the intervention, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention; annually up to 5 years
4

Overall Survival (OS) in Cancer Patients

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of death from any cause. Patients still alive at the last follow-up will be censored. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression will be used to estimate survival and explore associations with baseline and longitudinal nutritional status.

Time frame
From date of enrollment until death or last follow-up (up to 5 years)

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Nutritional Risk Assessed by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002)

Longitudinal evaluation of nutritional risk using the NRS-2002, which considers disease severity, nutritional impairment, and age. Total score ranges from 0 to ≥7 points. A score of ≥3 indicates nutritional risk and warrants intervention; \<3 indicates no immediate risk.

Time frame
Baseline, after the intervention, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention; annually up to 5 years
2

Serum Total Protein

Serum total protein concentration (g/L), used to evaluate protein-energy nutritional status. Measured using standard biochemical assays.

Time frame
Baseline, after the intervention, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention; annually up to 5 years
3

Serum Albumin

Serum albumin concentration (g/L), used to assess visceral protein status and systemic inflammation.

Time frame
Baseline, after the intervention, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention; annually up to 5 years
4

Serum Prealbumin

Serum prealbumin level (mg/L), an indicator of short-term changes in protein-energy nutritional status.

Time frame
Baseline, after the intervention, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention; annually up to 5 years

Other outcomes

1

Predictive Value of Baseline Nutritional Indicators for 30-Day Clinical Events

Evaluation of whether baseline nutritional indicators-including mPG-SGA scores and laboratory biomarkers such as albumin, prealbumin, and CRP-predict 30-day clinical outcomes, including mortality, ICU admission, and significant unintentional weight loss (\>5%). Logistic regression will be used for model construction and discrimination.

Time frame
Baseline to 30 days post-admission
2

Nutritional Trajectory Typing and Clustering

Identification of distinct nutritional change trajectories over time using latent class growth analysis (LCGA) and hierarchical clustering based on serial measurements of mPG-SGA and anthropometric data. Trajectories will be used to classify patients into nutritional risk subgroups.

Time frame
From baseline to 12-month follow-up
3

Agreement Between Nutritional Screening Tools (mPG-SGA vs. NRS-2002)

Assessment of the diagnostic agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of two nutritional screening tools-modified Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (mPG-SGA) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002)-in detecting malnutrition risk. Agreement will be evaluated using Cohen's kappa and ROC curve analysis.

Time frame
Baseline and each scheduled follow-up (up to 5 years)
4

Sociodemographic Determinants of Malnutrition

Analysis of sociodemographic factors-including income level, education, employment status, and rural vs. urban residence-in predicting baseline malnutrition and nutritional deterioration over time. Multivariable models will be used to explore independent associations.

Time frame
From baseline throughout study follow-up (up to 5 years)

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Xiaoqin Luo

Lead sponsor

Xi'an Jiaotong University

Sponsor institution