About this trial
Shoulder pain is one of the most commonly reported musculoskeletal complaints, which negatively affects upper limb use, night rest, daily life activities, work, sports performance and autonomy. Rotator cuff disease represents the most common cause of shoulder pain and it is responsible for up to 70% of all shoulder related visits to clinicians. Its incidence furthermore is expected to grow as the population ages. A wide range of conditions are included under the umbrella term of rotator cuff disease, including rotator cuff tendinopathy, subacromial bursal pathology, and partial-thickness or full- thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs). The latter ones, i.e. rotator cuff tears, form the indications for which the test devices, the SINEFIX implant and instruments, are intended.
Despite the high prevalence of this condition, the pathophysiology and healing potential are not well understood, making the condition challenging to predictably treat in some patient populations. RCTs may occur in young people as a consequence of trauma (e.g. acute shoulder dislocation), however RCTs typically present in middle-aged or elderly people and cannot always be attributed to precipitating events or trauma. Instead, they can be attributed to degenerative processes, and are therefore referred to as degenerative RCTs.
For RCTs, treatment options include both surgical and non-surgical (conservative) procedures.
In this context, the SINEFIX implant and instruments were developed to treat adult patients with rotator cuff lesions of size up to 2 cm through arthroscopic reconstruction.
A pilot study phase investigating the SINEFIX implant and instruments was conducted and showed adequate performance, usability and preliminary safety. Hence, the device is now being tested on a larger number of participants as part of the comparative study phase.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patient indicated for surgical repair of the rotator cuff tear according to current guidelines
Patient aged 18 years or older
Up to 2 cm tear size (medio-lateral) of supraspinatus, infraspinatus
Up to 2 cm tear size (anterior-posterior) of supraspinatus, infraspinatus
Disqualifiers
Subject has had previous rotator cuff, arthroplasty or fracture procedures on the operative shoulder
History of alcoholism, drug abuse, psychological or other emotional problems likely to interfere with participation in the study follow-up schedule and assessments
Inflammatory arthropathies
Subject with a contraindication/non-compliance for MRI examination
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Rotator cuff repair with the SINEFIX
DeviceTreatment of rotator cuff lesions of size up to 2 cm using the SINEFIX implant and instruments
Rotator cuff repair with comparator device
DeviceTreatment of rotator cuff lesions with the conventional surgical technique (comparator device)
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Functional and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair as compared with baseline
Functional and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair will be assessed using the increase in total Constant Murley score at 1 year follow-up compared with baseline (range 0 (worst outcome) -100 (best outcome))
Secondary outcomes
Surgery time
The total procedure duration will be recorded as the surgery time
Functional and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair
Functional and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair will be assessed using the total Constant Murley score at 6 months, 1 and 2 years follow-up (range 0 (worst outcome) -100 (best outcome))
Functional and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair as compared with baseline
Functional and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair will be assessed using the increase in total Constant Murley score at 6 months and 2 years compared with baseline (range 0 (worst outcome) - 100 (best outcome))
Shoulder function after rotator cuff repair (subjective evaluation)
Shoulder function after rotator cuff repair will be assessed through the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) which ranges from 0% to 100% (best outcome)
Other outcomes
Safety endpoint
Safety of the device will be evaluated by systematically reporting device deficiencies (DDs), adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and by monitoring the frequency and incidence of these events
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.