About this trial
The study aim is to explore the effects of a home-based exercise training smartphone application on sleep quality, fatigue, functional capacity, and quality of life among obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients in Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Male and female patients with confirmed mild or moderate OSA
aged between 18 and 65 years
BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2
agreed to participatein the study were recruited.
Disqualifiers
Pregnant patients
individuals younger than 18 or older than 65
those who refused to participate in the study
those with severe cardiopulmonary conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
CPAP device
DeviceCPAP device
CPAP device and exercise
DeviceCPAP device
Exercise
Other intervention1. Retropalatal level: Phase I: • Open your mouth • Pronounce "A" for 5 seconds • Stop. Close your mouth. Procedure: 2 sets of 10 repetitions. 2. Retroglossal level: Phase I: • Push the tongue against the front of the palate • Move it back to perform a "click" sound, Phase II: • Move the tongue from right to left and from up to down The sequence of movement directions can be randomized to increase the challenge for repetitions., Phase III: • In this exercise, the tongue of the patient will scroll • Circle with the tongue on the inside of the lips • Draw 10 circles per set. Phase IV: • pressing the back of the tongue firmly on the oral cavity's floor for 8 seconds. Phase V: • Step 1, bite the tongue depressor. • Step 2, push the tongue against the tongue depressor and hold for 8 seconds. Procedure: 2 sets of 10 repetitions. 3. Deglutition level: Phase I: • Gently hold the tongue between the front teeth • Maintain this position Then, close your mouth and swallow. Phase II: • This vers
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Quality of Life Assessment
The Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used to measure the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) at baseline and at follow-up. The SF-36 was selected because of its capacity to assess quality of life in both physical and psychological domains. It is considered a standard instrument for evaluating HRQOL and was created by Ware and Sherbourne in the United States. The 36 items on the questionnaire are broken down into eight domains. The ability to carry out daily tasks including walking, taking care of oneself, and relaxing is assessed by the Physical Functioning (PF) domain, which comprises items 3 through 11. The role restrictions due to physical problems (RP) domain, which includes items 12 through 15, looks at how role constraints and everyday activities are impacted by physical issues. Items 20 to 21 make up the Bodily Pain (BP) domain, which gauges how much pain has interfered with everyday activities and how severe it has been throughout the previ
Sleep Quality
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), created by Buysse et al., was used to evaluate the quality of sleep in each group. The PSQI is a self-reported instrument that assesses seven aspects of sleep quality over a month: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, length, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disruptions, use of sleep aids, and dysfunction during the day. The majority of the 19 items on the PSQI are answered on a Likert scale. Component scores, which range from 0 to 3, are produced by combining these items. A score of "0" indicates no sleep issues at all and score of "3" denotes serious sleep issues. For instance, the daytime dysfunction score is calculated from two items: the frequency of medication use for sleep and the frequency of trouble staying awake during daily activities such as driving or eating. These items are coded on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = no issues, 1-2 = mild issues, 3-4 = moderate issues, 5-6 = severe issues). The subjective sleep quali
Fatigue
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to measure the patient's level of fatigue.. Each of the nine FSS items, which rate the degree of fatigue symptoms and their impact on patient functioning (such as motivation, exercise, physical functioning, carrying out duties, and interfering with work, family, or social life), is given a score between 1 (completely disagree) and 7 (completely agree). The questions include statements like "my fatigue is very debilitating" and "exercise brings on my fatigue." For every item, a higher score denotes a higher level of fatigue. All patients who responded to at least half of the FSS items had their scores determined using the conventional scoring procedure for the FSS, which involves averaging the nine items to provide an overall score that ranges from 1 (no fatigue) to 7 (very severe fatigue). A FSS average score of \< 4 is considered non fatigue, while a score ≥ 4 indicates fatigue.
Functional Capacity
The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a widely utilized tool for assessing functional exercise capacity, particularly in patients with moderate to severe cardiovascular conditions. This test was employed in this study to measure the patients' functional capacity. The 6MWT is a straightforward and practical test that only requires a 100-foot hallway, with no specialized exercise equipment or advanced training for the administering technicians. Since walking is a common activity for nearly all patients, except those with severe impairments, the test measures the maximum distance a patient can walk in six minutes on a flat, hard surface. It evaluates the combined responses of various systems involved in exercise, including the pulmonary, cardiovascular, and peripheral circulatory systems, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. Unlike maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing, the 6MWT does not provide detailed insights into the function of individual organs or
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: