Social Groups for Autistic Young Adults (SDARIYA)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-30
SponsorDrexel University

About this trial

This is a clinical trial that will test whether a group program called SDARI (Socio-dramatic Affective Relational Intervention) can help autistic young adults between the ages of 18 and 30 feel more connected to others and improve their social relationships.

The study will try to answer:

Can SDARI be used successfully with autistic adults? Does SDARI help people feel more connected, supported, and mentally well?

There are two groups in the study. One group will participate in the SDARI program, and the other group will do different structured activities that don't focus on social connection. Researchers will compare the two groups to see if SDARI leads to better outcomes.

Participants will:

Complete screening to confirm eligibility (including autism traits and IQ) Attend weekly in-person group sessions for 10 weeks Take part in games and activities designed to support connection and collaboration Complete surveys and interviews before, during, and after the program Have the option to choose someone close to them (like a friend or family member) to fill out surveys about their experiences

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Have graduated from high school (or an equivalent program) and are between the ages of 18-30 years old

Demonstrate the ability to complete consent and all study measures and procedures in English

Score ≥ 65 on the RAADS

Score ≥ 70 on the KBIT-2R

Disqualifiers

Are still enrolled in high school (or an equivalent program) or are not between the ages of 18-30 years old

Are unable to complete study measures and/or procedures in English

Are unable to complete consent procedures

Score ≤ 65 on the RAADS

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • SDARI-YA

    Behavioral

    SDARI is a group-based, performance-based intervention designed to provide participants with opportunities to engage in and experience targeted interpersonal interactions, with minimal didactic instruction or instrumental reinforcement. The intervention consists of three core components: SDARI utilizes affectively motivating acting games that are adapted for the developmental stage and characteristics of the target population. Clinicians promote strong relationships among participants and between participants and clinicians by fostering a supportive and enjoyable environment, facilitating both structured and unstructured interactions, encouraging collaborative problem-solving, and reinforcing positive peer engagement. SDARI incorporates motivating activities-such as noncompetitive physical games, shared interests, and goal-oriented tasks-to enhance interpersonal motivation and engagement.

  • AYA

    Other intervention

    This group provides concrete presentation of thematic content and connects those themes to specific semi-structured, naturalistic games and activities. Themes are addressed and targeted according to the developmental needs of individual group members. Core Program Principles include: Use of recreational, motivational activities adapted for the target age range and population Positive reinforcement of interpersonal engagement through structured activities Integration of strong, age-appropriate motivators The AYA program uniquely combines these elements to facilitate both development and enjoyment. Group members engage in increasingly complex interpersonal interactions within the group setting and gain motivation to generalize these experiences across other environments, including home and educational contexts.

Treatment groups

54 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: SDARI-YAExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: AYAActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Social Responsiveness

measured by the Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (min= 0 and max=195), higher score= worse outcomes

Time frame
Day 1 (Baseline) Week 10 (Post-intervention) Week 22 (3-Month Follow-up)

Secondary outcomes

1

Friendship

measured by the Quality of Socialization Questionnaire for Young Adults (QSQ-YA): For the conflict subscale (min 0, max= 24), a higher score indicates worse outcomes. For the frequency items (min 0, max n/a (i.e. questionnaire asks how many get togethers did you have in a week), a higher count of get-togethers or dates indicates better outcomes

Time frame
Day 1 (Baseline) Week 10 (Post-intervention) Week 22 (3-Month Follow-up)
2

Anxiety

measured by Anxiety Scale for Autism (Adults) (ASA-A) (min=0, max=60, a higher score=worse outcomes)

Time frame
Day 1 (Baseline) Week 10 (Post-intervention) Week 22 (3-Month Follow-up)
3

Depression

measured by The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (min=0, max=27, higher scores=worse outcomes)

Time frame
Day 1 (Baseline) Week 10 (Post-intervention) Week 22 (3-Month Follow-up)
4

Capacity for social and interpersonal pleasure

measured by the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS) (min=17, max=102, higher scores indicate worse outcomes)

Time frame
Day 1 (Baseline) Week 10 (Post-intervention) Week 22 (3-Month Follow-up)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.