Sociocultural & Biobehavioral Influences on Pain Expression and Assessment

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-60
SponsorNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

About this trial

Objective

The current proposal investigates behavioral, psychophysiological, and social processes that may help explain biases and disparate outcomes in pain. Health disparities, or health outcomes that adversely affect disadvantaged populations, are pervasive and apparent in many diseases and symptoms, including pain. Pain is the number one reason individuals seek medical treatment. Health disparities in pain encompass both differences in pain experience and treatment for pain. For instance, research indicates that Black individuals report increased pain and have reduced pain tolerance relative to White individuals, yet doctors are less likely to treat minority patients pain and underestimate their pain experience. This project aims to address this systemic discrepancy by focusing on interpersonal processes that may contribute to these disparities, including socially-relevant responses to pain (i.e. pain expression) and pain assessment (e.g. visual attention). The proposed research aims to determine whether the study of pain expressions and their assessment can yield insights on how social factors shape pain and its treatment. Further, we test the efficacy of potential interventions designed to improve accuracy and reduce biases in pain assessment. If successful, this work will form the foundation of a new research program that will link the field of pain research with the field of social neuroscience, and forge new insights on the critical problem of health disparities in pain.

Study population

We will accrue up to 700 total healthy volunteers to target 325 completers

Design

Our overall aim is to understand how social factors influence the assessment and management of pain, and to gain insight into psychosocial processes that may underlie health disparities in pain. We propose a series of studies designed to test these links. First, we will measure pain perception and physiological responses to painful stimuli in a diverse group of individuals to test for sociocultural and biological influences on pain and pain-related responses. In subsequent studies, new participants ("perceivers") will view images of these initial participants ("targets") and will provide estimates of 'targets' pain experience. We will measure a) whether perceivers can accurately estimate 'targets' pain experience; b) whether accuracy differs as a function of similarity between target and perceiver (ingroup vs outgroup); and c) whether individuals can improve accuracy through feedback.

Outcome measures

Primary outcome measures for all experiments will be decisions about pain (experienced by self or other) measured with visual analogue scales, reaction time, and/or categorical judgments (pain/no pain). We will also measure physiological responses (e.g., facial muscle response, skin conductance, pupil dilation) and brain responses using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as secondary outcome measures. We will test whether pain and pain-related responses varies as a function of sociocultural/demographic factors (e.g. race, ethnicity, sex) and whether accuracy in assessing others' pain is influenced by group similarity (i.e. ingroup vs. outgroup) and training (e.g. performance-related feedback)....

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Healthy

Between 18 and 60 years old

Fluent in English

Able to provide written informed consent

Disqualifiers

Unable to comply with study procedures

Has a major-medical condition or medical history that in a clinician's assessment could affect ability to comply with study procedures, including neurological conditions (including stroke, blindness or deafness, or a history of brain damage)

Has a current mood disorder, anxiety disorder, or substance use disorder, or has a history of psychosis, hospitalization for a mental health condition, or recurrent psychiatric episodes.

NIH staff member who is a subordinate/relative/co-worker of any investigator on the protocol

Trial design

Design model

Sequential

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Medoc thermal stimulator

    Device

    Heat pain stimulation for substudy 1

  • Electric shock stimulator

    Device

    Electric pain stimulation for substudy 1

  • Cold water bath

    Device

    Cold pain stimulation for substudy 1

  • Pain assessment performance feedback

    Behavioral

    Participants in substudy 3's Feedback Group will be informed about their performance after every trial when making judgments about other people's pain.

Treatment groups

700 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Substudy 1: All participantsExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Substudy 2: Healthy volunteersNo intervention 0 interventions
Group C: Substudy 3: ControlNo intervention 0 interventions
Group D: Substudy 3: Feedback GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Physiological responses (facial muscle movement, skin conductance, respiration, pupil dilation, eye gaze position)

We measure facial responses to painful stimuli in substudy 1 and eye position in substudy 2 and 3.

Time frame
Every visit
2

Pain perception (pain ratings)

Individuals report their perceived pain or the pain they associate with other people they are viewing.

Time frame
Every visit

Secondary outcomes

1

Questionnaire measures (e.g. Fear of Pain questionnaire, McGill pain questionnaire)

We collect measures of identity and endorsement of beliefs about pain.

Time frame
Every visit

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.