About this trial
This is a prospective randomized control trial. Participants enrolled into the study will be randomized into one of three groups, two of which are treatment groups and the third is a control group. A time course of measurements before and after spinal cord stimulation (SCS) treatment (where applicable) will assess pain, DPN severity, small fiber nerve activity, and metabolic health markers.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Over 18 years old
Diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy refractory to treatment with gabapentin or pregabalin and at least 1 other class of analgesic
Diagnosis of medically refractory pain secondary to diabetic neuropathy
Presence of pain for 12 months
Disqualifiers
Severe medical comorbidities that, in the opinion of the surgeon, exclude the patient from surgical intervention
Spinal disease with severe spinal stenosis or spinal cord compression in the region of the proposed spinal cord stimulator lead placement
Coagulopathy that cannot be corrected
Unable to discontinue blood thinning medications
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation (SCS)
DeviceSpinal cord stimulator implantation is broken up into two parts. The first part involves placement of temporary SCS leads for a one-week trial. If the participants respond favorably to the SCS, then they will undergo the second part and the device is implanted
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Pain level
change in Visual analog pain scale (VAS). The VAS endpoints range from 'no pain at all' to 'pain as bad as it could be'
Change in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) Pain using the Neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4)
Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic "Douleur Neuropathique 4" questionnaire (DN4) is a screening questionnaire to help identify neuropathic pain (NP) in clinical practice and research. It is a clinican-administered questionnaire consisting of 10 items.The first 7 symptoms items are scored by interviewing the patient, and the 3 remaining items are scored by means of clinical examination. The scores are added and a score of 4 or more out of 10 is suggestive of neuropathic pain
Change in PROMIS quality of life in relation to pain level
Change in patient-reported outcomes measurement (PROMIS 29)
Secondary outcomes
change in neuropathic symptoms using Michigan Neuropathy Screening instrument
change in Michigan Neuropathy Screening instrument (MNSI). The MNSI is designed to be used in the outpatient setting. The MNSI is broken up into 2 parts. The first part consists of 15 yes/no questions on foot sensation. The highest score is 13, and the higher the score indicates more neuropathic symptoms.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Ohio State University
Lead sponsor
Neuright, Inc.
Collaborator
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Collaborator