About this trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new animated information film as a tool for introducing the concept of epidural as a method of labour pain relief to expectant women.
The main question that the study is designed to answer is:
Compared to written information alone, does the addition on a short animated introductory film reduce decisional conflict for expectant women regarding the use of epidural pain relief.
Secondary outcomes tested will be change in anxiety and satisfaction scores after receiving the information.
Study participants will include women expecting their first baby, presenting to hospital for induction of labour. They will be asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding thoughts and feelings around epidural, before and after receiving information about the procedure. Participants will be randomised to receive either traditional written information alone or with the addition of the animated film.
A smaller number of participants will also be asked to participate in a short interview about the animated film.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
Patient refusal
Unable to speak English or any of the seven language translations provided
Epidural contraindicated
Previous Epidural for any reason
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Participant views Epidural animation before reading gold standard written information
Other interventionAddition of introductory animation to written OAA epidural information card about labour epidural
Participant receives current gold standard written information alone
Other interventionGold standard OAA (Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association) epidural information card
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Decisional Conflict Score
Change in total Decisional Conflict Score (DCS) regarding labour epidural, before and after exposure to information material. The DCS is measured by response to various statements on a five point Likert scale: Maximum value = strongly agree, minimum value = strongly disagree. Strongly agree responses represent a better outcome.
Secondary outcomes
Change in the following DCS subscore categories.
Change in the following DCS subscore categories: uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, effective decision. The DCS is measured by response to various statements on a five point Likert scale: Maximum value = strongly agree, minimum value = strongly disagree. Strongly agree responses represent a better outcome.
Self-reported Likert scale outcomes
Self-reported Likert scale outcomes for understanding of the epidural procedure, associated anxiety and overall satisfaction with information received. Scale: Five point Likert scale; Maximum value = strongly agree, minimum value = strongly disagree. Strongly agree responses represent a better outcome, with one exception where the minimum value means a better outcome (response to statement: "I feel anxious about the idea of having an epidural")
Other outcomes
Qualitative analysis of post intervention structured interviews.
Focussed qualitative interviews involving a smaller patient group - to assess acceptability and specific feedback for the animated film itself.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
Lead sponsor
Imperial College London
Collaborator
University of Oxford
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: