About this trial
The QUESAM study aims to translate into French and validate the traduction of 2 screening questionnaires for spondylo-arthritis among people with inflammatory bowel disease.
DETAIL (DETection of Arthritis in Inflammatory boweL diseases) and IBIS-Q (Inflammatory Bowel disease Identification of Spondyloarthritis Questionnaire) questionnaires are built to determine which patients might benefit from a rheumatologic consultation, for a potential rheumatologic inflammatory disease.
The investigators will translate the 2 questionnaire in french thanks to an external translation company, from english to french, then back to english to make sure the translation is correct.
Then, the main question is:
is there a conceptual and semantic equivalence beetween the original english questionnaire and the french-translated one.
Participant will answer the 2 screening questionnaire, one initial time during a consultation, and a second time after 1 month.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patient with an inflammatory bowel disease according to gastroenterologist
Disqualifiers
No exclusion criteria
Difficulty for understanding or reading french
Persons covered by articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code
Patients with no social security coverage.
Trial population
The study population is people with inflammatory bowel disease
Trial design
Other
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Screening questionnaire
Other interventionEvery patient will answer the 2 screening questionnaires given to them, once at baseline and a second time after 1 month.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
translation and cross-cultural adaptation in french of the questionnaires developped by Di Marco et al (2017) and Variola et al (2020)
This is a composite criterion combining conceptual equivalence and semantic equivalence of items between the transcultural adaptation of the scale and its original version. Conceptual equivalence will be judged on the results of factorial analysis (exploratory and confirmatory). Semantic equivalence of items will be based on evaluation by a panel of experts.
Secondary outcomes
acceptability of the instrument via the proportion of missing data for each item
Evaluation of the internal consistency assessed by the average inter-item correlation, the average item-result correlation and cronbach's alpha coefficient
These tests aim to determine if the different items are close enough to measure the same thing and still different enough not to be redundant.
evaluation of the reliability of the questionnaire through an intra-rater reliability with the intra-class correlation.
Aims to determine if one rater answers the same questions the same way at two different moments.
Comparaison of the acceptability of the instrument via the proportion of missing data for each item
this will be done by comparing the proportion of missing data for the 2 questionnaires
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead sponsor
Clinique des Cèdres, Echirolles
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: