Spot Analysis of Natriuresis to Guide up- or Down-titration of Diuretic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCardiology Research UBC

About this trial

Heart failure is a chronic condition that causes congestion and frequent hospitalizations. Diuretic doses are usually adjusted based on clinical judgment without an objective measure of response. This study will test the feasibility of using point-of-care urine sodium measurements to guide up-titration or down-titration of loop diuretics in ambulatory patients with heart failure.

Participants will be assigned to one of three groups based on congestion status. Groups 1 and 2 will be randomized 1:1 to natriuresis-guided therapy or standard care. Group 3 will be observational. The 90-day pilot trial will evaluate feasibility, clinical outcomes, and usability of a urine sodium-guided titration strategy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years

Diagnosis of heart failure according to the Universal Definition

Use of loop diuretics

Residing in VCH or PHC regions

Disqualifiers

eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73m²

Renal replacement therapy

High-risk clinical status requiring hospitalization

Inability to consent or perform required urine sampling

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Natriuresis-Guided Up-Titration

    Behavioral

    Diuretic dose and regimen will be increased based on post-diuretic urine sodium concentration measured by a point-of-care sensor. Insufficient natriuresis (\<80 mmol/L) will prompt dose escalation using a predefined algorithm.

  • Standard care

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive usual clinical management of loop diuretics at the discretion of the treating physician, without natriuresis-guided adjustment.

  • Natriuresis-Guided Down-Titration

    Behavioral

    Loop diuretic doses will be reduced based on urine sodium levels. If urine sodium ≥80 mmol/L, the current dose will be maintained; if \<80 mmol/L, dose will be reduced according to a predefined algorithm. Re-titration criteria include symptomatic weight gain \>2 kg in one week.

  • Observational Follow-up

    Other intervention

    Participants who do not meet inclusion criteria for Groups 1 or 2 will undergo baseline urine sodium assessment and routine clinical follow-up. No study-directed titration will occur.

Treatment groups

300 Participants
are divided into 5 treatment groups
Group A: Group 1 - Natriuresis-Guided Up-TitrationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Group 1 Standard of Care (Up-Titration Control)Other 1 intervention
Group C: Group 2 Natriuresis-Guided Down-TitrationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: Group 2 Standard Care (Down-Titration Control)Other 1 intervention
Group E: Group 3 Observational CohortOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Clinical Congestion Score (Group 1)

Change in clinical congestion score among Group 1 participants. Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 22 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame
90 Days
2

Successful Down-Titration of Loop Diuretics (Group 2)

Proportion of Group 2 participants who maintain a reduced loop diuretic dose without needing up-titration during follow-up.

Time frame
90 Days

Secondary outcomes

1

Dyspnea Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Area Under the Curve

Change in dyspnea over time measured using serial VAS assessments.

Time frame
90 Days
2

Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) Score

Change in heart-failure related quality of life using the KCCQ-12. 12-item version. Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 100 Outcome Meaning: A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame
90 Days
3

Change in New York Heart Association Functional (NYHA) Functional Classification

Change in New York Heart Association functional classification. Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 4 Outcome Meaning: A higher class indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline, 30 days, 90 days
4

Signs of Volume Overload

90 Days

Time frame
Proportion of participants with clinical signs of volume overload.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.