Standardized Resistance Training Program and Assessment System for Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy ISPoRT-PCa-ADT Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. SPORT-MU

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age18+
SponsorFundacion para la Formacion e Investigacion Sanitarias de la Region de Murcia

About this trial

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel study arms evaluated the effectiveness of a 24-week exercise intervention in prostate cancer (PCa) patients under-going androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the University Clinical Hospital "Virgen de la Arrixaca" (Murcia, Spain). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) a supervised progressive resistance training program (SPoRT-PCa-ADT), or (2) a control group receiving a home-based exercise protocol following an initial assessment, accom-panied by weekly telephone follow-up. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 24 weeks to examine changes in physical, functional, and psychosocial outcomes. Addi-tionally, patient-reported outcomes were collected at the 12-week midpoint (Figure 1). This study design enabled the evaluation of both immediate and sustained intervention effects and facilitated a direct comparison between supervised and home-based exercise approaches

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic prostate neoplasm and current treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

treatment at the radiotherapy oncology department of University Clinical Hospital "Virgen de la Arrixaca"

legal adult age with signed informed consent

Disqualifiers

unwillingness to participate in the study

inability to complete adequate follow-up due to any cause that would prevent knowledge of patient evolution during the follow-up period

no controlled or symptomatic metastatic bone disease

physical disabilities that would prevent participants from safely completing the exercise protocol

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Exercise Intervention Protocol

    Procedure/Surgery

    Subjects participated in the supervised exercise program twice weekly (with a 48-72-hour interval between sessions) for 24 weeks, totaling 48 supervised sessions. The progressive resistance training program used velocity-based training principles \[24-26\], a novel approach in exercise oncology that allows for precise load management and indi-vidualization based on daily performance capacity

  • SPoRT-Control Intervention

    Procedure/Surgery

    structured written instructions for a personalized home-based resistance training program. The protocol was designed to prioritize safety, progressive adaptation, and individualization based on each participant's functional capacity and available resources at home. The program was intended to be performed two to three times per week on non-consecutive days, focusing exclusively on lower-body training through a single primary movement. Each session consisted of three effective sets of 12 repetitions, which served as the standard training volume for the main exercise.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: SPORT Protocol interventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: SPORT Control interventionActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Progressive loading test

squat (SQ) exercise to evaluate strength and velocity parameters. Participants performed the SQ starting from an upright position with knees and hips fully extended, feet parallel and shoulder-width apart, and the bar resting on the upper back at the acromion level. Each participant descended continuously until the top of the thighs were below the horizontal plane, with the posterior thighs and shins in contact (\~35-40° knee flexion), then immediately reversed the movement to return to the upright position.

Time frame
Up for a 24 weeks
2

Vertical jump test

In the countermovement jump (CMJ) test, participants performed five maximum CMJs with 20-second rests between jumps. Before CMJ evaluation, participants warmed up by performing two sets of 10 squats without external load, 5 submaximal CMJs, and 3 maximum CMJs. CMJ height was calculated from flight time values determined using a contact platform (Chronojump Boscosystem®, Barcelona, Spain). After discarding the highest and lowest CMJ heights, the resulting average was retained for further analysis. This test was employed as a measure of lower body power and neuromuscular function, which are commonly impaired in patients undergoing ADT.

Time frame
up for 24 weeks
3

Maximum Isometric Contraction Test

Maximum isometric force (MIF) and maximum rate of force development (RFDmax) were measured during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) test in the squat (SQ) exercise with participants standing and knees flexed at 90° (180° = full exten-sion). This test was performed on a quadriceps extension machine. Participants were in-structed to push against the force platform as quickly and forcefully as possible following the "ready, set, go!" signal during two 5-second trials separated by 1-minute rests. External forces were recorded at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz and processed using specific software (Chronojump Boscosystem®, Barcelona, Spain). RFDmax was calculated as the maximum slope in the time-force curve over 20 ms intervals. Additionally, the average tangential slope of the time-force curve obtained at different time intervals (50, 100, and 150 ms from the onset of force production, RFD0-50, RFD0-100, and RFD0-150, respec-tively) was calculated. The average value of each var

Time frame
up for 24 weeks
4

Fatigue assessment

Cancer-related fatigue, one of the most common and debilitating side effects of cancer treatment and ADT, was assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). This validated 9-item questionnaire measures the severity of fatigue and its interference with daily activities. Scores are categorized as mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10) fatigue. The BFI has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity in cancer populations and is sensitive to changes following exercise interventions

Time frame
Up for 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: