About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare stepped care to stratified care as overall healthcare models for children and adolescents aged 8-17 with anxiety disorders. It addresses one main question:
• Is stepped care non-inferior to stratified care in supporting participants to achieve a treatment response?
Researchers will compare two care models:
* Stepped care, where all participants begin with 14 weeks of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) and receive an additional 14 weeks of personalized in-person CBT if needed. * Stratified care, where participants are assigned to either 14 weeks of ICBT or 14 weeks of in-person CBT based on clinical complexity, and may also receive additional 14 weeks of in-person CBT if necessary.
Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned to one of the two care models. * Complete a wide range of assessments at baseline, during treatment, and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 months, with the 8-month point as the primary endpoint. * Receive either ICBT, in-person CBT, or both, depending on their care model and response to treatment. * Participate in ancillary studies involving DNA sampling, cognitive testing, and national registry linkages to help predict treatment response and long-term outcomes.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Aged 8.0 to 17.5 years. Confirmed by the child and/or caregiver.
Principal DSM-5-TR anxiety disorder of social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia, or agoraphobia. Confirmed by the structured diagnostic interview (DIAMOND-KID). "Principal" indicates that the anxiety disorder is judged by the clinician to be in most urgent need of treatment (among potential co-occurring disorders).
Available caregiver who can support the child in treatment. Confirmed by the caregiver.
Child and at least one caregiver can read, write, and communicate in Swedish. Confirmed by the child and/or caregiver.
Disqualifiers
Principal DSM-5-TR anxiety disorder of specific phobia concerning the domain of blood-injection-injury (due to the ICBT program not including relevant information on applied-tension techniques to avoid fainting during exposure exercises). Confirmed by a specific phobia of this sort being classified as the most functionally impairing anxiety disorder during the structured diagnostic interview (DIAMOND-KID).
Ongoing psychological treatment for an anxiety disorder. Confirmed by the child and/or caregiver.
Social/familial/educational difficulties in more immediate need of management than an anxiety disorder. Confirmed by the assessor through information from the child and/or caregiver and/or other available sources.
Immediate risk to self or others that require urgent attention, such as suicidality. Confirmed by the assessor through information from the child and/or caregiver and other available sources.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy
BehavioralInternet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) is a 12-module intervention delivered over a maximum of 14 weeks. Two age-specific versions are available: \[1\] for children aged 8-12 years and \[2\] for adolescents aged 13-17 years. Both versions share the same core content, but the texts, illustrations, videos, and exercises are adapted to be developmentally appropriate. Each version focuses on exposure, along with psychoeducation, coping strategies, and relapse prevention. Caregivers have access to a parallel program that mirrors the structure of the youth program. Both patients and caregivers engage with a therapist through a secure digital platform, communicating via text messages similar to emails. Two scheduled telephone or videoconference calls are conducted approximately 3-4 and 7-8 weeks into treatment, respectively, to follow up on adherence and address questions related to the intervention. Additional telephone support will be available on demand.
Personalized in-person cognitive-behavioral therapy
BehavioralPersonalized in-person cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) follows a manual drawing on previously published protocols and meta-analyses on effective components of CBT for pediatric anxiety disorders and results from our pilot study. It consists of 12 weekly one-hour sessions delivered over a maximum of 14 weeks. It follows a disorder-specific CBT approach, with a strong emphasis on therapist-led exposure tailored to the patient's principal anxiety disorder. Participants receive workbooks containing information on anxiety disorders, the treatment rationale, and the rationale for exposure therapy. The intervention has three phases: \[1\] 1-2 sessions of psychoeducation and symptom identification, \[2\] 8-10 sessions of therapist-led exposure with homework, and \[3\] 1-2 sessions of relapse prevention planning. Caregiver involvement is tailored to the individual needs of each participant, with a maximum of 2 additional hours allocated for caregivers beyond the standard treatment time.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement Scale
The Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale is a 1-item measure where a trained interviewer uses all available information about the patient to rate improvement on a 7-point scale: 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse. In this study, improvement on the CGI-I is assessed by comparing the current status of the participant to their baseline condition. In line with previous studies, a score of 1 or 2 on the CGI-I is classified as a treatment response and scores of 3 to 7 as non-response. This binary variable is the primary outcome of the trial.
Secondary outcomes
Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale
The Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician-rated measure of overall anxiety severity. It includes seven items assessing the number of anxiety symptoms, their frequency, anxiety-related avoidance, anxiety-related distress, physical symptoms of anxiety, family interference, and social interference. In the current study, in accordance with other trials for youth anxiety disorders, the 6-item version of PARS is used which excludes the item assessing number of symptoms. The resulting 6-item scale yields a score of 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.
Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and OCD and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders - Child and Adolescent Version
The Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and OCD and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders - Child and Adolescent Version (DIAMOND-KID) is a semi-structured interview that assesses the most common mental disorders in children and adolescents, including all the anxiety disorders used for inclusion in the present study. The full interview is conducted at baseline and at the 12- and 24-month post-randomization assessments. A shortened version that includes anxiety disorders and major depression is conducted at the 4- and 8-month post-randomization assessments. Data from the DIAMOND-KID will be used to evaluate the proportion who no longer meet diagnostic criteria for \[1\] their principal baseline anxiety disorder and \[2\] any anxiety disorder.
Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity
The Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity (CGI-S) is a single-item measure where a trained assessor makes an overall severity rating of a specific disorder accounting for all available information about the patient, including but not limited to current symptoms, impairment, and general functioning. In this study, in line with previous trials of youth anxiety disorders, the CGI-S is used to rate the overall severity of the patient's anxiety symptoms, irrespective of their association with a specific anxiety disorder.
Children's Global Assessment Scale
The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) is a clinician-rated one-item scale of psychosocial functioning/impairment, ranging from 1 to 100 with higher scores indicating better functioning.
Other outcomes
Health economic outcomes
Health economic evaluations, including the calculation of Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICER) and assessment of willingness-to-accept thresholds, will be performed. The details will be specified in a separate Health Economic Analysis Plan (HEAP) and the planned approach is available in the full study protocol at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/a9qhw/). These measures will not be used to make inference about the non-inferiority RCT regarding anxiety outcomes.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Region Skane
Lead sponsor
Lund University
Collaborator