Strategies Empowering Activities in Everyday Life: An Internet-based Occupational Therapy Intervention

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorLuleå Tekniska Universitet

About this trial

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, potential outcomes and the implementation process of a second updated version of an internet-based intervention in occupational therapy, focusing on self-management in activities of everyday life to promote health in people with chronic diseases.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnosed with, or at risk of developing, a chronic disease/long-term condition such as long-term pain, stress-related conditions, chronic fatigue syndrome, rheumatological diseases, lung diseases, or neurological conditions.

Age: 18-75 years

Experiencing difficulties to have an active everyday life and/or experiencing a need to develop self-management strategies in everyday life.

Have access to a screen/computer, internet and e-ID as well as being able to use them

Disqualifiers

Sickness or disease which causes difficulties with understanding written and verbal advice (e.g. mental or cognitive illness).

Having an ongoing misuse

Receiving palliative care

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Strategies Empowering Activities in Everyday life (SEE 2.0)

    Behavioral

    SEEs internet-based intervention process begins with supporting the client to explore the need of and readiness for changes in everyday life. Thereafter, the client is supported to self-analyse their engagement in activities in everyday life along with use of management strategies in everyday life. Next, the client takes on web- modules including short educational movies with subsequent analyses and reflections. The modules aim to support the development of self-management by improving the knowledge of how strategies and changes in daily activities can prevent disabilities and contribute to improved health. After that, the focus is on establishing an activity plan with goals and activity-based management strategies to promote an active everyday life. The clients' implementation of the plan is supported through follow-up meetings. During the whole intervention process, the client is regularly supported by an occupational therapist through feedback and online guiding dialogues.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: InterventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The Satisfaction with Daily Occupation (SDO-13)

Measures change in satisfaction of daily occupations through a structured interview with 13 questions within areas such as work/studies, leisure, home and self-care occupations. Satisfaction with occupations is measured on an ordinal scale with a score ranging from 0-7. The total rating range between 13-91. Higher score indicates a higher satisfaction with daily occupations.

Time frame
Change from baseline to four- and twelve months post-base line
2

Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ)

Measures change in perceived occupational balance; occupational balance reflects a person's subjective perception of having the right amount of- and the right variation between activities. The OBQ consist of 11 items rated on a four-point ordinal scale, scored 0 to 3. A total score may range between 0 and 33 where a higher score implies a higher sense of occupational balance.

Time frame
Change from baseline to four- and twelve months post-base line
3

Occupational values with pre-defined items (Oval-pd).

Measures change in occupational values which reflects the subjective perception of concrete, symbolic or self-rewarding values in activities. The Oval-pd consists of 18 items rated on a four-point ordinal scale, scored 1 to 4. The responses add up to a total score between 18-72, a higher score indicates higher occupational value in the activities of everyday life.

Time frame
Change from baseline to four- and twelve months post-base line

Secondary outcomes

1

Life satisfaction questionnaire (Lisat-11)

Measures a change in life satisfaction. Lisat-11 consists of 11 items rated on an ordinal scale scored 1-6. A higher score indicates a higher level of life satisfaction.

Time frame
Change from baseline to four- and twelve months post-base line
2

Work ability index (WAI)

Measures a change in self-perceived work ability. Self-perceived work ability is rated on a 10-point ordinal scale and a higher score indicates higher perceived work ability.

Time frame
Change from baseline to four- and twelve months post-base line
3

RAND-36

Measures change in perceived health and function in everyday life and consists of 36 items with an ordinal scale across 8 dimensions of health. The dimensions of health are graded on a scale 0-100 and a higher score indicates a higher perceived health and function in everyday life.

Time frame
Change from baseline to four- and twelve months post-base line
4

General Self-Efficacy (GSE-10)

Measures change in self-reported self-efficacy which consists of 10 items on an ordinal scale from 1-4. The total score ranges from 10-40 and a higher score indicates higher self- efficacy.

Time frame
Change from baseline to four- and twelve months post-base line

Other outcomes

1

The experience of people with chronic conditions participating in the intervention process of SEE.

Qualitative individual open-ended interviews with client participants focusing on experiences of SEEs intervention process.

Time frame
Repeated interviews during the intervention process, one- and four months post-baseline
2

The acceptability and value of SEE from the perspective of the clients.

A study specific questionnaire. The items are rated on an ordinal scale, ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores reflect higher levels of acceptability and value of SEE.

Time frame
Four months post-baseline
3

The adherence to SEE.

The adherence of SEE will be studied with a structured interview using a study specific feasibility registration form assessing whether the intervention is delivered and taken as intended. The structured individual interview based on the feasibility registration form will be conducted with the occupational therapist delivering SEE to each client.

Time frame
Through intervention completion, an average of 1 year
4

The experience of how feasibility, implementation, and context influence SEE.

Experiences the feasibility and the implementation process of SEE from the perspectives of the delivers, i.e., the occupational therapists, their managers and other stakeholders/key persons will be explored qualitatively in groups interviews.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 year

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.