Study EHR Risk Stratification Tools

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorUniversity of California, Los Angeles

About this trial

This study evaluates whether adding machine learning-based risk information to electronic health record (EHR) lab result messages helps older adults better understand their risk of developing diabetes and influences their emotional responses, quality of life, and healthcare use.

Eligible participants are adults aged 65 years and older with a UCLA primary care provider and a hemoglobin A1c level in the range (5.7-6.0%). Participants are identified automatically at the time their lab results are processed and are randomly assigned to receive either standard lab result messages or modified messages that include a "very low risk" label generated by a machine learning model.

All participants who are randomized are invited to complete two surveys: one shortly after their lab result is posted in MyChart and a follow-up survey approximately 30 days later. The study also uses de-identified EHR data to examine patterns of healthcare utilization and progression to diabetes. Provider comments related to lab result messaging will be analyzed to explore differences in response patterns between the two groups.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 65 years or older

Hemoglobin A1c in the prediabetes range (5.7- but not including 6.0%)

Disqualifiers

Have lab results outside the defined inclusion range

No UCLA primary care provider

Age <65 years

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Hemoglobin A1c Lab Result Communication Tool

    Device

    A behavioral intervention delivered through a personalized Electronic Health Record (EHR)-integrated lab result communication tool designed to improve emotional and cognitive responses to lab results among adults aged 65+. The tool applies behavioral science principles such as risk personalization, simplified messaging, and visual framing to reduce patient anxiety, enhance understanding, and support informed decision-making.

Treatment groups

1,200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Personalized Lab Result MessagingExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Standard Lab Result MessagingNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Prediabetes- Related Healthcare Utilization

Total count of prediabetes-related healthcare utilization defined as the sum of outpatient visits to endocrinology, repeat hemoglobin A1c tests, and new prescriptions for diabetes-related medications following the index A1c result.

Time frame
365 days after result

Secondary outcomes

1

Number of Repeat Hemoglobin A1c Tests

Total number of repeat hemoglobin A1c laboratory tests performed after the index test. This measure reflects follow-up glycemic testing and serves as an indicator of diabetes-related monitoring and healthcare utilization.

Time frame
365 days after result
2

Number of Prescriptions for Diabetes-Related Medications

Total number of prescriptions issued for medications commonly used for glycemic management (e.g., metformin) following the index hemoglobin A1c result. This outcome captures initiation of pharmacologic treatment related to diabetes risk.

Time frame
180 days after result
3

Total Number of Outpatient Healthcare

Total count of outpatient visits across all specialties following the index A1c result

Time frame
180 days after result
4

Numbers of Referrals to Endocrinology

Total number of outpatient referrals to an endocrinologist occurring after the index hemoglobin A1c laboratory result. This measure is used to quantify diabetes-related specialty care utilization potentially associated with interpretation of the laboratory result communication.

Time frame
14 days after initial result

Other outcomes

1

Self-Reported Quality of Life

Patient-reported quality of life assessed using survey responses evaluating overall physical, mental, and health-related well-being following receipt of lab result communication.

Time frame
30 days after initial survey invitation
2

Self-Reported Physical Function Following Lab Result

Self-reported physical function asking about ability to perform activities such as household chores, stair climbing, walking, and running errands following receipt of lab result communication. This measure uses structured survey items to evaluate whether receipt of A1c lab result communication is associated with changes in exercise.

Time frame
30 days after initial survey invitation
3

Self-Reported Dietary Behaviors Following Lab Result

Patient-reported dietary behaviors following receipt of lab result, including eating patterns, appetite, satiety, and food-related changes or restrictions due to concerns about lab results. These behaviors are assessed to understand potential impacts on health and weight-related decision-making. This measure uses structured survey items to evaluates whether receipt of A1c lab result communication is associated with changes dietary behaviors.

Time frame
30 days after initial survey invitation
4

Patient Understanding and Anxiety Related to Lab Result Communication

Patient-reported understanding of lab report and emotional response to result communication, including perceived clarity, reassurance, and level of concern, assessed using structured survey items designed to measure comprehension and anxiety following receipt of laboratory result messaging.

Time frame
7 days after results

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of California, Los Angeles

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Collaborator