About this trial
Neuroscent aims to analyze EEG signals induced by olfactory stimuli in individuals with normal and impaired olfactory functions, with a focus on patients with tinnitus. The study seeks to develop reliable diagnostic methods using EEG to differentiate between normosmic and hyposmic subjects during olfactory tests, potentially enhancing our understanding of the brain's response to olfactory stimuli. This 24-month interventional study with a device to be patented will involve 1000 participants and aims to establish more effective diagnostic and therapeutic tools for olfactory disorders
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Subjects over 18 years of age who have given consent for the collection of specified data, including medical history and personal information, for the purposes of project implementation and in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutions where the project will be conducted.
Disqualifiers
Previous fractures of the facial bones, particularly the ethmoid bone.
Active tumors of the brain or face, including tumors of the nose, paranasal sinuses, oral cavity, or nasopharynx.
Active nasal-sinus conditions, particularly radiologically proven sinusitis.
Mass in the pontocerebellar angle, especially schwannoma of the VIII nerve.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Sniffin'Sticks
Diagnostic testThe Sniffin' Sticks test, a validated method to evaluate olfactory functions, utilizes pen-like devices to dispense scents for testing identification, discrimination, and detection of odors. In this study, participants' responses to various scents are recorded. EEG (Electroencephalography) captures electrical activity in the brain during exposure to these odors by using an EEG cap fitted with electrodes on the scalp. This allows for the monitoring of brain wave patterns in response to olfactory stimuli. Both the Sniffin' Sticks test and EEG recordings are conducted simultaneously, providing a dual assessment of behavioral reactions and brain activity to odors. The goal of the study is to compare brain wave patterns and olfactory function in normosmic (normal smell), hyposmic (reduced smell), and tinnitus patients with and without olfactory impairments, delivering comprehensive insights into the neural basis of olfactory perception.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Enrollment and data collection
During this period, 1000 participants \> 18 y/o will be recruited and divided into four distinct groups: normosmics (550), hyposmics (150), tinnitus patients with hyposmia (150), and tinnitus patients without hyposmia (150). The primary outcome of the Neuroscent project is to assess the ability of EEG analysis to distinguish between normosmic and hyposmic participants during olfactory stimulation using the Sniffin' Sticks test.
EEG Parameters (in µV²)
Alpha Power: Measured in microvolts squared (µV²), representing the magnitude of Alpha wave activity during olfactory stimulation. Theta Power: Measured in microvolts squared (µV²), representing the magnitude of Theta wave activity during olfactory stimulation. We will make use of the Fourier transform as well, which is inherently dimensionless. The data acquisition setup involves placing blindfolded participants in an isolated room and administering three randomized olfactory stimuli (pure olfactory, trigeminal, and olfactory-gustatory) while collecting EEG data. Sessions start and end with a 30-second resting state.
Behavioral/Performance Measures (Scores)
Olfactory Threshold Scores (as per routinary diagnosis of olfactory performances): Derived from the Sniffin' Sticks test, these scores quantify participants' ability to detect odors, classifying them as normosmic or hyposmic. All the participants will undergo a complete olfactory assessment through the Sniffin' Sticks test. These are represented as numerical scores. The maximum score obtainable in the full Sniffin' Sticks test, which includes the three sub-tests (Threshold, Discrimination, Identification - TDI), is 48. This maximum score is achieved by summing the highest possible score from each of the three components: 16 for olfactory threshold (Threshold), 16 for olfactory discrimination (Discrimination), and 16 for olfactory identification (Identification).
Model Performance Metrics (Accuracy)
Random Forest Model Classification Accuracy: The accuracy of the classification model used to distinguish between normosmic and hyposmic participants based on EEG data, usually expressed as a percentage or a value between 0 and 1.
Secondary outcomes
Pure Tone Audiometry Test
Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA), as per routinary diagnosis of Tinnitus: Measures hearing thresholds across frequencies, reported in decibels Hearing Level (dB HL) to determine the degree of hearing loss. The results are plotted on an audiogram, which shows the person's hearing threshold at different frequencies; a normal audiogram threshold is 0-20 dB HL between 250 and 8k Hz.
Behavioral/Performance Measures (Scores)
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI): Scores the impact of tinnitus on a scale from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a worse impact of tinnitus.
EEG Parameters
EEG Data: Analyzed during exposure to olfactory stimuli (as per Primary Outcome), with features reduced via t-SNE and classified using a Random Forest algorithm.
Model Performance Metrics
Random Forest Model Classification Accuracy: Measures the accuracy of the model used to classify participants across the four groups. This is typically expressed as a percentage or a value between 0 and 1. Fleiss' Kappa Statistic: Used to evaluate the agreement of classification, reported as a kappa coefficient.
Other outcomes
Predicting Odor Categories in Tinnitus and Non-Tinnitus Groups Using EEG and Machine Learning
The final outcome will involve comparing olfactory perception across four participant groups (normosmic, normosmic with tinnitus, hyposmic, and hyposmic with tinnitus) using EEG features derived from Fourier analysis, reduced via t-SNE, and classified with a Random Forest algorithm. The model's accuracy in predicting odor categories (based on EEG data) will be evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score. Fleiss' kappa statistic will assess agreement across groups, comparing the algorithm's predictions with the Sniffin' Sticks test results. Statistical power analysis ensures adequate sample sizes for reliable comparisons, with post-hoc analyses conducted if significant differences are detected.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: