About this trial
The objective of this study is to determine if the use of scissors without electrosurgery is superior to bipolar electrosurgery for resection of uterine septum. The investigators will be comparing procedure-level variables such as operative time, complications, and need for additional procedures.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Have a confirmed septum (>1.0 cm) confirmed with 3D imaging and/or MRI
20-44 years old
Disqualifiers
Known tubal disease
Bleeding diastasis
No blood thinners
No concurrent laparoscopy scheduled
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Removal of uterine septum with hysteroscopic scissors without electrosurgery.
Procedure/SurgeryHysteroscopic septoplasty utilizing scissors without electrosurgery followed by hysteroscopic morcellation of residual tissue
Hysteroscopic septoplasty utilizing bipolar electrosurgery
Procedure/SurgeryHysteroscopic septoplasty utilizing bipolar electrosurgery
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Procedure-level variables: operative time hysteroscopic septoplasty
We will measure time it takes to conduct procedure
Procedure-level variables: Surgical Cost
We will compare amount of money spent.
Procedure-level variables: Fluid deficit
We will measure amount of fluid deficit which is a number that is generate by hysteroscope.
Resolution of uterine septum
Compare septum resolution defined by being less than 1 cm in depth from the intertubal line and need for additional intervention following hysteroscopic septoplasty utilizing these two surgical techniques
Secondary outcomes
Compare adverse events
Characterize and compare any potential adverse events related to the two surgical techniques for hysteroscopic septoplasty
Comparing patient recovery and satisfaction
Comparing patient recovery and satisfaction with follow up post-operative phone calls with standardized questions
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.