Surgical Management of Lateral Ankle Instability: Modified Broström-Gould Versus Arthroscopic Allograft Reconstruction of the Anterior Talofibular and Calcaneofibular Ligaments.

ConditionAnkle Sprain
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria

About this trial

Primary Objective:

To clarify whether arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft provides tangible benefits over the modified open Broström-Gould technique, or if both are equivalent in efficacy and safety. The clinical AOFAS scale will be used for assessment.

Secondary Objectives:

To determine if there are differences in health outcomes and patient-perceived pain using the specific SP-36 scale and verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS). Additionally, to assess differences in postoperative complication rates and time to return to daily life activities between the two surgical techniques.

Study Design:

Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups stratified by age and functional demand.

Condition or Disorder Being Studied:

Chronic lateral ankle instability.

Study Population and Sample Size:

The target population includes subjects diagnosed with chronic lateral ankle instability. The study population consists of patients diagnosed in the Orthopedics consultations at Hospital Infanta Elena who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on sample size calculations, a total of 36 patients will be recruited. However, due to the prospective nature and stratification by epidemiological and functional variables, the sample size may be increased to ensure comparable groups in each stratum.

Study Timeline and Estimated Completion Date:

The study is expected to begin in the third quarter of 2025. Recruitment is estimated to last 24 months, with a follow-up period of 12 months, for a total duration of 3 years, ending in the third quarter of 2028.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age >18 years

Subjective sensation of instability

Pathological anterior drawer and varus tilt compared to the contralateral side

Magnetic resonance imaging showing lesion of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL)

Disqualifiers

History of previous ankle surgery

Tibiotalar osteoarthritis or presence of chondral lesions on magnetic resonance imaging

Active infections

Contraindications for surgery

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Arthroscopic reconstruction surgery

    Procedure/Surgery

    Arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft, in which a tendon (generally from a tissue bank) is used to reconstruct the ligaments. This technique is performed through small incisions using arthroscopy.

  • Open surgery

    Procedure/Surgery

    Open surgery consists of the modified Broström-Gould technique, which allows for the reconstruction of damaged ligaments using the patient's own tissues through an incision on the lateral side of the fibula. This technique has shown satisfactory functional results.

Treatment groups

36 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Open surgery armActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Arthroscopic surgeryActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Clarify whether arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft provides tangible benefits over the modified open Broström-Gould technique, or if both are equivalent in efficacy and safety.

Clarify whether arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft provides tangible benefits over the modified open Broström-Gould technique, or if both are equivalent in efficacy and safety. For this purpose, the clinical AOFAS (American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Score) score will be used. The minimum value for the AOFAS score is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores on the AOFAS scale indicate a better outcome, meaning less pain, better function, and improved alignment.

Time frame
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Determine whether there are differences in health outcomes

Determine whether there are differences in health outcomes using the specific SP-36 (Short Form Health Survey) scale, is a 36-item questionnaire designed to measure health-related quality of life, it measures eight items: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. The score goes from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status).

Time frame
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
2

Determine whether there are differences in patient-perceived pain

Determine whether there are differences in patient-perceived pain by using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS). This score is widely used tool for assessing pain intensity, it measures pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst paing imaginable).

Time frame
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
3

Determine whether there are differences between both groups in the rate of postoperative complications.

Determine whether there are differences between both groups in the rate of postoperative complications, defined as: Delay or absence of surgical wound healing, superficial infection, deep infection, recurrence or persistence of instability, sural nerve and superficial peroneal nerve neuropathy and complex regional pain syndrome. They are all qualitative variables. They will be expressed in the categories: yes or no.

Time frame
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
4

Determine whether there are differences in time to return to normal life between the two surgical techniques.

Determine whether there are differences in the time to return to normal life between the two surgical techniques. To do this, we will compare both groups in terms of time expressed in days.

Time frame
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

Lead sponsor

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz

Sponsor institution

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz

Collaborator