Pepea Pamoja: Cluster-Randomized Trial for Caregivers of Children With Autism in Kenya

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-90
SponsorIndiana University

About this trial

Pepea Pamoja is a ten-session, group-based caregiver intervention designed to improve caregiver well-being and strengthen caregivers' ability to support communication and positive behavior in children with autism. This study will enroll approximately 240 caregivers of children ages 2-8 years in western Kenya. Caregiver groups will be randomized to one of three conditions: standard-of-care control, professional-led Pepea Pamoja, or peer-led Pepea Pamoja.

The study will determine whether each Pepea Pamoja delivery model improves caregiver and child outcomes compared with control and will directly compare peer-led and professional-led delivery. Outcomes will include caregiver stress and well-being, child communication and behavior, and blinded observations of child social communication and caregiver-child interaction. An embedded mixed-methods evaluation will examine implementation, sustainability, program and societal costs, and cost-effectiveness.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Caregiver age ≥18 years

Able to provide informed consent

English or Kiswahili speaking

Primary caregiver and legal guardian

Disqualifiers

Caregiver lacks capacity to provide informed consent.

Child has a vision or hearing impairment that would preclude valid participation in the intervention or outcome assessments.

Child is currently receiving another structured autism intervention at enrollment.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Professionally-facilitated groups

    Behavioral

    Participants will receive the standardized ten-session Pepea Pamoja caregiver intervention delivered by trained professional facilitators. Core curriculum content, session structure, caregiver practice opportunities, participant materials, and fidelity standards will be standardized across active intervention arms.

  • Peer-facilitated groups

    Behavioral

    Participants will receive the same Pepea Pamoja curriculum and intervention dose as the professional-led arm. Delivery will be provided by trained caregivers with lived experience raising a child with autism who have successfully completed facilitator training and competency assessment.

Treatment groups

240 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Professional-led Pepea PamojaExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Peer-led Pepea PamojaExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Standard of Care ControlNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Family Burden and Stress

Change in caregiver-reported burden and stress levels from baseline to 3 months, measured using the Caregiver Self-Assessment Questionnaire developed by the American Medical Association. This 18-item tool includes 16 yes/no items assessing emotional and physical strain, one item rating stress on a scale from 1 (no stress) to 10 (high stress), and one item comparing current health to health one year ago. Higher scores indicate greater caregiver burden and stress.

Time frame
Baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up
2

Child Functional Communication

Change in child functional communication measured using the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales (CSBS). Higher scores indicate stronger communication skills and improved functional communication abilities.

Time frame
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

1

Quality of Life in Caregivers

Change in caregiver-reported quality of life from baseline to 3 month follow-up, measured using the Quality of Life - Family Version instrument developed by Betty Ferrell, PhD. This 37-item ordinal scale assesses quality of life across four domains for family members caring for a patient. Each item is rated from 0 (worst outcome) to 10 (best outcome), with several items reverse-scored. Subscale scores are calculated by averaging items within each domain. Higher overall scores indicate better caregiver quality of life.

Time frame
Baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up
2

Quality of Life in Children

Change in caregiver-reported quality of life for children from baseline to 3 month follow-up, measured using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales. This 23-item instrument assesses physical, emotional, social, and school functioning across four multidimensional scales and three summary scores. It is developmentally appropriate for ages 2-18 and includes both child self-report (ages 5-18) and parent proxy-report (ages 2-18). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame
Baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up
3

Parenting Stress Index

Change in parenting stress from baseline to 3 month follow-up, measured using the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF). The PSI-SF total score ranges from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater parenting stress and a worse outcome. Each of the 36 items is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and the measure includes three subscales: Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child.

Time frame
Baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up
4

Depressive Symptoms in Caregivers

Change in caregiver depressive symptoms from baseline to 3 month follow-up, measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression and a worse outcome. Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).

Time frame
Baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up

Other outcomes

1

Acceptability of Intervention

Assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) and items aligned with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). The AIM is a 4-item scale rated from 1 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"), total score range 4-20; higher scores indicate greater acceptability. Supplementary qualitative interviews will be coded using a deductive framework based on CFIR and Proctor's IOF to explore perceived acceptability and inform program adaptation.

Time frame
Post-intervention (6 months)
2

Feasibility of Intervention - Quantitative Assessment

Feasibility of the caregiver autism intervention, assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The FIM is a validated 4-item scale designed to assess the extent to which an intervention can be successfully used or carried out within a given setting. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"), yielding a total score range of 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility and a better outcome.

Time frame
Post-intervention (6 months)
3

Feasibility of Intervention - Qualitative Assessment

Feasibility of the caregiver autism intervention, assessed through semi-structured qualitative interviews with caregivers and facilitators. Transcripts will be coded using a deductive codebook aligned with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and constructs from Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF). Thematic analysis will identify perceived acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, reach, barriers, facilitators, and recommended refinements. Findings will be summarized using a joint diagram supported by illustrative quotes.

Time frame
Post-intervention (6 months)
4

Fidelity of Intervention Delivery

Fidelity of intervention delivery assessed through audio-recorded sessions scored using a standardized fidelity rubric. The rubric evaluates facilitator adherence to core curriculum components, delivery quality, and responsiveness. Fidelity metrics are informed by prior implementation of the Pepea Pamoja and Takia programs. Scores will be aggregated across sessions to produce a mean fidelity score per facilitator. Curriculum adaptations will be documented, and facilitator training will include competency checklists, booster trainings, and structured feedback meetings to support fidelity.

Time frame
10 weeks

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Indiana University

Lead sponsor

Moi University

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: