About this trial
Background: Physicians worldwide face an increasing administrative burden that diverts time from direct patient care. Among inpatient documentation tasks, authoring hospital course summaries is particularly time-consuming and critical for safe care transitions. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for clinical text generation; however, robust evidence from randomized, evaluator-blinded trials conducted in routine hospital practice remains limited. Objectives: The CLEAN study aims to evaluate whether LLM-assisted, specialistedited generation of hospital course summaries is non-inferior in safety compared with standard clinician-written documentation in routine inpatient care. Secondary objectives include noninferiority assessments of resident-edited and unedited LLMgenerated summaries. Additional objectives are to evaluate summary quality across predefined domains, quantify physician documentation time, assess LLM generation stability, measure clinician adoption following the randomized phase, and examine inter-, intra-observer, and test-retest reliability of expert assessments. Methods: This is a single-centre, double-campus, exploratory randomized controlled non-inferiority trial conducted at a tertiary university hospital. Consecutive hospital discharges across multiple clinical departments are randomized 1:1 to either an LLM-assisted documentation workflow or standard manual authorship. The intervention integrates an on-premise LLM into a parallel hospital information system, generating draft hospital course summaries from complete, uncurated clinical documentation, which physicians may review and edit prior to finalization. Safety, the primary outcome, defined as presence of all important information and absence of incorrect/hallucinated information, is assessed by an adjudication committee blinded to documentation workflow. Secondary outcomes include content validity, workflow efficiency, generation stability, post-trial clinician adoption, and reliability metrics. A total of 786 discharge episodes are required to assess non-inferiority using a predefined margin of 5 percentage points. Ethics and Dissemination: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice, and the General Data Protection Regulation. A waiver of informed consent is sought due to minimal risk and exclusive use of routine clinical data. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and engagement with healthcare stakeholders.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
No exclusion criteria
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
LLM assisted workflow for generating the hospital course summary
DeviceThe intervention consists of an LLM assisted workflow for generating the hospital course summary at discharge. The treating physician initiates discharge using an application - CorteVision Hospital Suite - connected to the hospital Informix database. The output of the model - generated draft is returned to the application interface, where the treating physician reviews and may edit, correct, expand, or shorten the text before finalization. The finalized hospital course summary is entered into the medical record only after physician review and confirmation.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Safety assessed by outcome evaluator on an ordinal scale (1,2,3)
Safety will be assessed using an ordinal scale ranging from "acceptable without further changes", through "acceptable with minor revisions", to not "unacceptable in its current form" ( a combination of either absence of important information or presence of incorrect/hallucinated information)
Secondary outcomes
Safety of the edited and unedited LLM generated course summaries evaluated on an ordinal scale (1,2,3)
Safety of LLM-generated, resident-edited and un-edited hospital course summaries compared with standard specialist-written documentation. Safety, will be assessed using an 3 categories ordinal scale ranging from "acceptable without further changes" (best outcome), through "acceptable with minor revisions" (uncertain outcome), to "not unacceptable in its current form" (absence of important information or presence of incorrect/hallucinated information; worst outcome)
Secondary outcome: Content validity across the following predefined domains (5C).
Secondary outcomes measures: detailed evaluation of quality across the following predefined domains (5C): completeness, conciseness, cohesiveness, absence of critical errors (including hallucinations), and cultural and linguistic fidelity. Individual domains will be separately assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, (1 - complete absence of agreement, 2 - partial absence of agreement, 3 - neutral agreement, 4- partial agreement, 5- complete agreement)
Time to complete hospital summary (seconds)
Workflow-related secondary outcomes include time efficiency of hospital course documentation when using the LLM-generated workflow compared with standard practice. The outcome measure will be the time taken to complete the hospital course summary (seconds), from initiating discharge to "ready to signing".
Generation stability assessed on an ordinal scale (1,2,3)
Generation stability will assess the consistency of LLM generated unedited hospital course summaries when the model is applied repeatedly to identical source clinical documentation. Generation stability will be evaluated by the same adjudicator on the scale of 1 - stable, 2 - acceptable variation, 3 - unacceptable variation
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Pavol Jozef Safarik University
Lead sponsor
Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Košice
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: