The ACTIVE Trial: A Prospective Randomised Control Trial Of The H1 Implant Versus Total Hip Replacement

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorEmbody Orthopaedic Limited

About this trial

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the success of two types of hip replacement in patients with hip arthritis. The main question it aims to answer is whether a new type of hip replacement (called a hip resurfacing) can be as successful as an existing hip replacement (called a total hip replacement). Patients will be given either the new hip resurfacing or the existing total hip replacement and researchers will compare their function, complication rate and physical activity.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient requires unilateral primary hip arthroplasty due to primary osteoarthritis, osteoarthritis secondary to e.g. trauma, avascular necrosis or developmental hip dysplasia, or inflammatory arthritis.

Patient is willing to comply with study requirements.

Patient plans to be available through 10 years postoperative follow-up.

Disqualifiers

Patient has a BMI greater than 40 kg/m².

Patient has active infection or sepsis (treated or untreated).

Patient has insufficient bone stock at the hip (>1/3 necrosis of the femoral head or large and multiple cysts) or in general as in severe osteopenia or osteoporosis (t-score < -2.5 as measured with BMD).

Patient is not skeletally mature.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • The H1 Implant

    Device

    Patients allocated to The H1 Implant arm will be implanted with the H1 Implant which is a cementless, ceramic hip resurfacing device.

  • Cementless total hip replacement

    Device

    Patients allocated to cementless total hip replacement arm will be implanted with a cementless ceramic-on-poly or ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: The H1 ImplantExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Cementless total hip replacementActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Composite clinical success (CCS)

The primary outcome is "composite clinical success". This is a binary outcome measure. Patients are deemed to have achieved CCS if they meet all of the following criteria at the 24 month timepoint: * Modified Harris Hip Score ≥80. * No revision or pending revision. * Acetabular radiolucencies: not in all zones. * Femoral radiolucencies: not in all zones. * Absence of subsidence/migration of the acetabular or femoral component \>5mm with clinical findings. * Absence of specific adverse device effects (ADEs) that are pre-cursors to revision of the device, namely: * Bone breakage around the implanted component(s) (periprosthetic fracture). * Breakage of the device component. * Device movement/migration of clinical consequence as defined by associated clinical findings as: a limp; leg length discrepancy; and restricted range of motion. * Dislocation of the hip joint.

Time frame
24 months post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

1

Physical Activity

Average daily minutes of activity and mean bouted daily moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), minutes

Time frame
6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively
2

Physical Activity

Physical performance assessment: number of chair stands in 30 seconds and time taken to perform stair climb test

Time frame
Pre-operatively, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively
3

Physical Activity

Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Questionnaire

Time frame
Pre-operatively, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively
4

Physical Activity

UCLA (University of California Los Angeles) Activity Score

Time frame
Pre-operatively, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Embody Orthopaedic Limited

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London

Collaborator

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

Collaborator