The Banded Mini Gastric Bypass Trial: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMarc van Det

About this trial

Rationale: Investigate if there is a significant weight reduction expressed in total body weight loss percentage (%TBWL) in patients 5 years after surgery, whom underwent a mini gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) with addition of the implantation of a MiniMizer Ring.

Study design: A prospective non blinded single centre randomized controlled trial.

Sudy population: The study population will exist of patients eligible for MGB-OAGB surgery. Patients are invited to participate if Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35kg/m2 with a comorbidity related to morbid obesity, or a BMI exceeding 40kg/m2.

Intervention: Insertion of the MiniMizer Ring around the gastric pouch in addition to the 'standard' MGB-OAGB.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary Objective:

1. %TBWL 5 years after surgery.

Secondary Objectives: 2. Percentage Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) 5 years after surgery. 3. Decrease or reduction of comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnoea, and joint complaints). 4. Improvement of quality of life: SF-36 and OBESI-Q questionnaires. 5. Incidence and severity of dumping syndrome. 6. Incidence and severity of reflux symptoms: GERD-HRQoL questionnaire. 7. Incidence and complications due to silicone band.

Measurement of objectives are before surgery and six times after surgery combined with the standard postoperative care for patients who undergo bariatric surgery:

Expected advantages of bOLGB versus OLGB:

1. Increase of weight reduction, and due to that decrease of comorbidities and/or mortality related to overweight. 2. Long term decrease of weight regain. 3. Decrease of incidence of dumping.

Possible disadvantages of bOLGB versus OLGB:

1. Band-related complications such as erosion, infection, stenosis, or pouch dilatation. 2. Functional gastro-intestinal complains such as dysphagia and reflux.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients meet IFSO criteria for Bariatric Surgery

Age 18 and above

Disqualifiers

Previous Bariatric surgery

Inability to read and understand written information

Any genetic condition that can hamper the acceptance of medical advice

chronic bowel disease

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Placement of MiniMizer Gastric Ring

    Device

    Insertion of MiniMizer Gastric Ring in addition to the normal MGB-OAGB

  • Normal MGB-OAGB

    Procedure/Surgery

    No insertion of Minimizer Gastric Ring in addition to the normal MGB-OAGB

Treatment groups

210 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Banded Mini Gastric BypassExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: non-Banded Mini Gastric BypassActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Total Body Weight Change 5 years after surgery

Percentage total body weight change 5 years after the procedure

Time frame
5 Years

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Percentage Excess Weight (%EWL) 5 years after surgery

Change in Percentage Excess Weight (%EWL)

Time frame
5 years
2

Change in (existing) co-morbidities 5 years after surgery

Change in severity of obesity-related co-morbidities: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (changes in HbA1c or use of antidiabetic medication), Hypertension (changes in bloodpressure or changes in use of antihypertensives), Osteo-arthritis (changes in VAS-score or use of analgesia drugs) , Hyperlipidemia (changes in HDL/LDL ratio, triglycerides or use of statine drugs), Obstructive Sleep Apnea syndrome (changes in use of CPEP treatment or changes is apneu hypopneu idex), and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (Changes in outcomes of GERD-HR questionnnaire which scoring scale runs from 0 (asymptomatic) to 50 (complete prohibitive) or changes in use of protonpompinhibitors)

Time frame
5 years
3

Outcome measurement of SF-36 questionnaire

Evalution of changes in outcome of SF-36 Questionnaire 5 years after surgery. Scoring scale is described between 0 (lowest) and 100 (highest) to evaluate patient's welfare

Time frame
5 years
4

Outcome measurement of OBESI-Q questionnaire

Evalution of changes in outcome of OBESI-Q Questionnaire 5 years after surgery. Scoring scale is described between 0 (lowest) and 100 (highest) to evaluate patient's welfare

Time frame
5 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Marc van Det

Lead sponsor

Ziekenhuisgroep Twente

Sponsor institution

Ziekenhuisgroep Twente

Collaborator