The Effect of a Peer Mentoring Program on Nursing Students

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorSuleyman Demirel University

About this trial

This project is designed as a quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effect of the Peer Leadership Program, established in the Nursing Department, on nursing peer mentor students' empathic self-efficacy, social self-efficacy, and youth leadership characteristics.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

The term "volunteers" is used to designate students enrolled in the 2024-2025 academic year, in their second, third or fourth year of studies, who are actively engaged in the education and training process.

Disqualifiers

Students who indicated a preference for not being a first-year student and instead volunteered to serve as peer mentors.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • First Session

    Other intervention

    Introductions, explanation of the purpose and content of the project, realisation of the pre-test application. Giving the assignment with the theme of 'Nursing and Society' between peer mentors and mentees.

  • Second Session

    Other intervention

    Training of peer mentors on communication techniques, interview methods and empathic approach.

  • Third session

    Other intervention

    Sharing postcasts on communication techniques, interview methods and empathic approach with peer mentors.

  • Fourth session

    Other intervention

    Training of peer mentors on social motivation and leader-member interaction

  • Fifth Session

    Other intervention

    Sharing postcasts with peer mentors on social motivation and leader-member interaction.

  • Sixth Session

    Other intervention

    Presentation of 'Nursing and Society' themed assignments of peer mentors and mentees as a group (Composition, poem, poster, presentation, role play, etc. are left free among the students) and post-test application.

Treatment groups

32 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Training material sharing and activity sessionsExperimental treatment 6 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Perceived Empathic Self-Efficacy and Social Self-Efficacy Scale

The scale was developed by Di Giunta et al. (2010), and the Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Akın and Başören. The scale comprises 11 items and two dimensions, with respondents invited to indicate their level of agreement on a five-point Likert scale, where 1 represents a complete disagreement and 5 represents complete agreement. The items are distributed according to the two subscales, namely perceived empathic self-efficacy (items 1-6) and perceived social self-efficacy (items 7-11). A high score on the first sub-dimension of the scale, empathic self-efficacy, indicates that the individual perceives themselves as capable of responding empathically to the needs and feelings of others. A high score on the second sub-dimension, social self-efficacy, indicates that the individual perceives themselves as capable of initiating and managing interpersonal relationships.

Time frame
Before Training and Activities (First Session) and at the Final Session After 6 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Youth Leadership Traits scale

The 'Youth Leadership Characteristics Scale' developed by Cansoy and Turan in 2016 in 5-point Likert form consists of 40 items and seven sub-dimensions. The sub-dimensions are; willingness to struggle and goal setting (7 items), ability to communicate (7 items), group skills (7 items), decision making skills (4 items), problem solving skills (4 items), responsibility (5 items), self-confidence (6 items). In Cansoy and Turan's (2016) study, the Cronbach's Alpha value of the scale was found to be 0.92. According to the frequency of the behaviour shown, the youth leadership traits scale is planned as Always '5 points', Frequently '4 points', Occasionally '3 points', Very rarely '2 points', Never '1 point'. The increase in the score indicates that the approach is positive.

Time frame
Before Training and Activities (First Session) and at the Final Session After 6 Weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.