The Effect of Chiropractic Care on Opioid Use for Chronic Spinal Pain: A Feasibility Study

ConditionBack Pain
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMcMaster University

About this trial

The investigators will conduct a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of chiropractic care added to usual medical care, versus usual medical care alone, for adult patients prescribed opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer spinal pain at four community health centers (CHCs) in Canada. These centers provide services to communities and vulnerable populations with high unemployment rates, multiple co-morbidities, and high rates of chronic musculoskeletal disorders that are commonly managed with prescription opioids.

The investigators hypothesize that a full-scale (definitive) cluster RCT on the impact of chiropractic care on prescription opioid use for chronic non-cancer spinal pain will be feasible within the Canadian CHC context.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

CHC in Canada

Roster of ≥ 3,500 patients

One or more opioid-reducing strategies implemented as part of their standard medical services (e.g., chart audits, tracked performance metrics related to high dose prescribing)

Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years)

Disqualifiers

Individuals already receiving chiropractic care

Opioid-naive (or < 90 consecutive days of opioid prescription) at baseline

Total active opioid dosage of < 50 mg MED at baseline

Spinal neoplasms or other 'red flag' diagnoses (e.g., fractures, infections, inflammatory arthritis, or cauda equina syndrome)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Usual Medical Care

    Other intervention

    In both the intervention and control arms of the study, usual medical care will be defined as any and all medical care provided to patients with chronic non-cancer back or neck pain at a Canadian CHC, including: primary care provider consultation visits, prescription medication (e.g., muscle relaxants, anti-inflammatories, anti-depressants, opioid and non-opioid analgesics), referral for diagnostic testing (e.g., lab work, imaging) or specialist consultation, as well as other co-interventions (e.g., visits with nurses, dieticians, social workers, or physiotherapists) as determined by their PCP. PCPs will also engage study participants in a formal effort to reduce their opioid use within the framework of each CHC's current opioid-reduction practices.

  • Usual Medical Care + Chiropractic Care

    Other intervention

    Treatment sessions may include high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy, as well as any or all of the following: spinal mobilization, soft-tissue massage/trigger point therapy, education and reassurance (e.g., pain management, ergonomic and activities of daily living recommendations), and home advice (e.g., icing, spinal stretching, core muscle strengthening, and cardiovascular exercises). As part of the intervention, chiropractic clinicians will engage PCPs in a collaborative effort to support opioid tapering. Consistent with current clinical practice guidelines, participants will be provided up to a maximum of 18 chiropractic visits during the active care period, although participants may continue with treatment after the 12-week period (e.g., one visit, every 2-4 weeks) to manage episodes of exacerbation/flare-up.

Treatment groups

24 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Usual Medical CareActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Usual Medical Care + Chiropractic CareExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Participant Enrolment

Participant enrolment will be assessed by monitoring screening and enrolment metrics, including: 1) initiation of screening and recruitment at CHCs, 2) proportion of eligible patients approached for participation, 3) proportion of patients who provide informed consent, and 4) length of time required to enrol approximately six participants at each CHC. All outcome measures will be aggregated and interpreted via a "traffic light" approach (i.e., "green light" - proceed with RCT, "yellow light" - proceed with changes, "red light" - do not proceed unless changes are possible).

Time frame
From start of enrollment up to 26 weeks (or study end)
2

Treatment Allocation

Feasibility of the treatment allocation will be assessed using the following metrics: 1) adherence to chiropractic care in addition to usual medical care allocation, and 2) adherence to usual medical care allocation. All outcome measures will be aggregated and interpreted via a "traffic light" approach (i.e., "green light" - proceed with RCT, "yellow light" - proceed with changes, "red light" - do not proceed unless changes are possible).

Time frame
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 18- and 26-week follow-up
3

Refinement of Data Collection Methods

To refine the data collection methods, the following metrics will be reviewed: 1) proportion of participants with missing data for the primary clinical outcome, and 2) proportion of case report forms with missing data for the participant-reported outcomes (BQ, Bothersomeness questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L, and patient satisfaction). All outcome measures will be aggregated and interpreted via a "traffic light" approach (i.e., "green light" - proceed with RCT, "yellow light" - proceed with changes, "red light" - do not proceed unless changes are possible).

Time frame
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 18- and 26-week follow-up
4

Compliance with the Protocol

The following outcomes will be used to assess compliance with the protocol: 1) participant compliance with scheduled appointments, 2) proportion of participants who complete each follow-up visit, 3) proportion of participants who withdraw consent to participate in the trial, and 4) proportion of participants who cannot be located. All outcomes will be aggregated and interpreted via a "traffic light" approach (i.e., "green light" - proceed with RCT, "yellow light" - proceed with changes, "red light" - do not proceed unless changes are possible).

Time frame
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 18- and 26-week follow-up

Secondary outcomes

1

Daily Prescribed Opioid Dosage

CHC information technology personnel will extract opioid prescription data from participants' individual electronic medical records to obtain the dose of chronic non-cancer spinal pain-related opioid prescriptions from baseline to 26-week follow-up. Opioid dosage will be measured in milligrams (mg) of morphine equivalents daily (MED). To calculate the MED for each prescribed opioid, the investigators will multiply the quantity x the mg per unit dispensed x drug-specific conversion factors.

Time frame
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 18- and 26-week follow-up
2

Risk of Higher-Dose Opioid Prescriptions

CHC information technology personnel will extract opioid prescription data from participants' individual electronic medical records to obtain the dose of chronic non-cancer spinal pain-related opioid prescriptions. Opioid dosage will be dichotomized as either high (e.g., ≥ 90 mg) MED or low (e.g., \< 90 mg) MED at baseline and each follow-up interval. The threshold for opioid dose will be dependent on the central tendency of MED in the patient sample. A sensitivity analysis will also be conducted using a threshold of 50 mg MED.

Time frame
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 18- and 26-week follow-up
3

Number of Opioid Prescriptions

CHC information technology personnel will extract opioid prescription data from participants' individual electronic medical records to obtain the number and type of chronic non-cancer spinal pain-related opioid prescriptions (i.e., unique opioid fills and subsequent refills) over the entire course of follow-up, tabulated at the end of follow-up.

Time frame
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 18- and 26-week follow-up
4

Level of Pain Intensity, and Physical and Emotional Functioning as measured by the Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ)

The BQ consists of 7 items (i.e., pain intensity, function in activities of daily living, function in social activities, anxiety, depression levels, fear avoidance behavior, and locus of control/self-efficacy), each scored from 0-10 ("0" = no disability, "10" = complete disability) for a total of 70. To optimize interpretability, the investigators will convert mean effects to risk differences using the anchor-based minimally important difference (MID) of the BQ established for chronic low back pain patients.

Time frame
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 18- and 26-week follow-up

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

McMaster University

Lead sponsor

Surgical Methods Centre, McMaster University

Collaborator

Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care

Collaborator

Ontario Chiropractic Association

Collaborator

Alliance for Healthier Communities

Collaborator

Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre

Collaborator

Canadian Chiropractic Research Foundation

Collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: