About this trial
The aim of this study is to determine the effects of range of motion and Benson relaxation exercises applied to patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment on dialysis adequacy, treatment adherence, and quality of life.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Being 18 years of age or older
Receiving HD treatment for at least 1 year
Receiving HD treatment 3 days a week for 4 hours
Being able to speak Turkish
Disqualifiers
Patients with chronic diseases affecting breathing (advanced COPD, cancer)
Patients with hearing or speech problems
Patients with a diagnosed psychiatric condition
Patients with conditions that impede movement, such as burns, open wounds, edema, thrombophlebitis, limited mobility, fistulas, or previous surgical operations in the extremities
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Range of Motion Intervention (ROMI)
Other interventionProcedure Steps: * The patient is evaluated for factors that may affect the procedure (restricted movement, presence of fistula, history of surgery, etc.). • The patient is placed in the supine position. • Movements are performed from head to toe. • Each movement is repeated 3-5 times. • With the patient's head and chin supported, the following movements are performed sequentially: flexion, extension, hyperextension, right lateral flexion, left lateral flexion, right rotation, and left rotation of the head. * The patient's shoulder is supported. Without bending the elbow, the following movements are performed sequentially: flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, internal and external rotation. The same movements are performed sequentially for the forearm, wrist, and fingers. * All movements are performed sequentially for the other arm, hip, and both legs.
Benson Relaxation Exercise Intervention (BREI)
Other interventionProcedure Steps: * The patient is asked to choose a word that is important to them and that they can focus their attention on (health, well-being, love, affection, God, etc.), a prayer, or a short sentence. * They are asked to close their eyes in a calm environment and in a comfortable position. * They are asked to slowly relax their muscles from foot to head (foot, calf, thigh, abdomen, chest, shoulder, neck, and head). • They are asked to breathe in through their nose and repeat the chosen word as they exhale. * They are asked to continue the procedure for 10-20 minutes. They are informed that they can open their eyes occasionally to monitor the time, but they should not set an alarm. • After the procedure is complete, they are asked to wait a few minutes with their eyes closed. Then, they are asked to wait a few minutes with their eyes open. • The patient is informed that they should not worry about whether they performed the procedure correctly.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
SEVEN-POINT SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT (SGD-7P)
It can be used to determine dialysis adequacy. The SGD-7P scale will be used to assess the nutritional status of patients. The SGD-7P was developed by Detsky et al. in 1984. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Eminsoy et al. in 2019. The scale has five evaluation criteria for medical history and three evaluation criteria for physical characteristics. For each evaluation criterion, an option is selected on a scale of 1-7 points. As a result of the average of the obtained scores, it is classified as 6-7 points (well-nourished), 3-5 points (mild-moderate malnutrition), and 1-2 points (severe malnutrition).
END-STAGE RENAL FAILURE - COMPLIANCE SCALE
The scale was developed by Kim and Evangelista (2010). The Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the scale were carried out by Ok and Kutlu (2017). The SDBYUÖ consists of 4 subscales: hemodialysis participation, medication adherence, fluid adherence, and diet adherence. Hemodialysis participation is the sum of the scores of items 1, 3, and 5; medication adherence is the score of item 6; fluid adherence is the score of item 8; and diet adherence is the score of item 9. The total score of the scale ranges from 0 to 1200. A higher score indicates higher treatment adherence.
Kidney Disease Patients Quality of Life Scale (KDQOL-36)
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale, developed by Hayy et al. in 1994, was conducted by Yıldırım et al. in 2007. The scale consists of two scales: the SF-12 form, comprising a summary of the physical component and a summary of the mental component. It comprises a total of 4 sections and 36 items covering the burden of kidney disease, symptoms of kidney disease, and effects of kidney disease. There is no total score; each dimension is scored between 0 and 100. A score closer to 100 indicates a high quality of life, while a score closer to 0 indicates a low quality of life.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: