The Effect of Nature and Game Based Activities on Older People

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorOndokuz Mayıs University

About this trial

The purpose of this study is determine the effect of nature and game based activities on happiness, spiritual well-being, frailty and cognitive status of older people in nursing home.

Hypotheses of the Research H0: Nature and game-based activities don't affect the happiness, spiritual well-being, cognitive function and frailty of older people in nursing home.

H1a: Happiness levels of older people in nursing home will be an increase after nature and game-based activities.

H1b: Spiritual well-being levels of older people in nursing home will be an increase after nature and game-based activities.

H1c: Cognitive function levels of older people in nursing home will be an increase after nature and game-based activities.

H1d: Frailty status of older people in nursing home will be a decrease after nature and game-based activities.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Older people who have been in a nursing home for at least 6 months,

Older people aged 65 years and over,

Older people with a Mini Mental State score of 24 and above,

Older people who are open to communication and co-operation will be included in the study.

Disqualifiers

Older people with physical problems that may prevent them from participating in nature and game based activities (such as stroke, Parkinson's),

Older people with visual and hearing loss that may pose an obstacle to nature and game based activities,

Older people with mental problems (such as dementia) that would prevent participation in nature and game based activities were excluded from the study.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Nature and Game Based Activities

    Other intervention

    Individuals in experimental group will participate nature and game activities such as terrarium making, planting flowers, making puzzles in intervention.

Treatment groups

52 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Experimental GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Control GroupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Subjective Happiness Scale

Subjective Happiness Scale was developed by Lyubomirsky and Lepper (1999) and adapted to Turkish by Akın and Satıcı (2011), and its validity and reliability were performed. This scale consists of 4 items in total and has a 7-point Likert type. The 4th item of the scale is reverse coded, and a total score is obtained by adding the scores of the items. A minimum of 4 and a maximum of 28 points are obtained from the scale. A high score from the scale indicates high perceived general subjective happiness, while a low score from the scale indicates low perceived subjective happiness. Cronbach Alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.86 and test-retest reliability coefficient is 0.73.

Time frame
This scale will be applied before and after the 8-week experiment.
2

Standardized Mini Mental State Examination

Standardized Mini Mental State Examination was developed by Folstein et al. (1975) to be used in dementia screening and adapted into Turkish by Güngen et al. (2002) to assess cognitive status. This scale is examined under five main headings and evaluated as recording memory (3 points), orientation (10 points), recall (3 points), attention and calculation (5 points) and language (9 points). There are two separate forms of the Mini Mental State for educated and uneducated individuals. The scale is evaluated out of 30 points; 24-30 is considered as normal, below 24 as cognitive impairment, 18-23 as mild dementia, 12-17 as moderate dementia and below 12 as severe dementia.

Time frame
This scale will be applied before and after the 8 weeks experiment.
3

Tilburg Frailty Indicator

Tilburg Frailty Indicator was developed by Gobbens et al. (2010) and adapted into Turkish and its validity and reliability was conducted by Arslan et al. (2018). Tilburg Frailty Scale consists of two parts. Part A includes 10 questions about diseases and sociodemographic factors that determine frailty; Part B consists of three factors that are components of frailty, including a total of 15 questions. The score range varies between 0-15; 5 or more a high score point is considered as frailty in Tilburg Frailty Indicator.

Time frame
This scale will be applied before and after the 8-week experiment.
4

Spiritual Well-Being Scale

Spiritual Well-Being Scale was developed by Ekşi and Kardaş (2017) for adults in order to determine the process of understanding and living their lives in personal, social, environmental and trascendental aspects in line with human values and ultimate meanings. The scale consists of 29 items and has a five-point Likert type. Seven questions in the scale (3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23 and 26) are calculated inversely. The score that can be obtained from the scale is between 29-145. The higher the score obtained from the scale, the higher the level of spiritual well-being. Cronbach Alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.886.

Time frame
This scale will be applied before and after the 8-week experiment.

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: