The Effect of Psychoeducational Diagnosis Communication on Perception of Illness, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions Among Patients With Functional Neurological Movement Disorders

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorMedical University of Graz

About this trial

Functional neurological movement disorders are common conditions that can lead to significant limitations in daily life. They result from a functional disorder in the brain. A clear, understandable, and empathetic explanation of the diagnosis is a crucial first step in treatment. The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate how a clear and detailed explanation of the diagnosis of functional neurological movement disorders affects patients' understanding of their condition and their symptoms The investigators are interested in how well patients understand the diagnosis and the symptoms they experience as the disease progresses, as well as how the conversation between patient and doctor is experienced from both perspectives. In addition, as part of the study, a one-time examination using brain imaging (magnetic resonance imaging) will be conducted to better understand possible differences in brain function.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Functional paralysis

Functional seizures

Functional tremor

Functional drop attacks

Disqualifiers

The patient is unable to give informed consent.

The patient is temporarily unable to give informed consent.

The patient does not have sufficiently understand German language to answer the questionnaires (the questionnaires are available only in German).

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Psychoeducational communication guide for first-diagnosis of FND

    Behavioral

    The intervention is a structured communication protocol used by physicians to provide a systematic, evidence-based explanation of the diagnosis to patients with Functional Movement Disorders (FMD). The primary goal is to foster a common understanding of the condition, validate the patient's experience, and establish a foundation for active rehabilitation. The psychoeducational session follows a 14-step framework designed to address the clinical, neurological, and psychological dimensions of the disorder

Treatment groups

35 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Standardized FND Psychoeducation GuidelineExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Illness Perception

Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R), Range (min, max scores) varies by subscale (typically 1-5 per item), Higher scores indicate more negative perceptions.

Time frame
4 months (at each measurement point)
2

Trust in the diagnosis

3 questions whether participants trust the diagnosis

Time frame
From immediately post-intervention to the last follow up
3

Doctor shopping intentions

Question on whether participants intent to consult other physicians regarding their diagnosis in the future

Time frame
From post-intervention to the last follow up
4

Symptom Burden of functional movement disorders

Symptom-Functional Movement Disorder Rating Scale (S-FMDRS), Range: 0 - 60; higher scores mean greater symptom burden and severity

Time frame
at baseline and the pre-intervention

Secondary outcomes

1

Functional comorbidities

measured with selected subscales of the PHQ-D , which is the German translation and validation of the "Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)" by Löwe et al., 1999. Higher values indicate higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, or somatization. Scores range from 0-3 per item.

Time frame
at baseline
2

Patient-reported outcome measures of functional neurological disorders

PROM questionnaire by Michaelis et al. (2026) assessing the extent and the impact of the movement disorder on the patient. Self-reported measurement. Range: 16 to 80 with higher values indicating higher severity/impairment.

Time frame
at baseline, pre-intervention, 1st and 2nd follow up
3

health-related quality of life

Assessed with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF36), a questionnaire of the patient's subjective quality of life, measured with 36 items rated on a likert scale, range of the total score goes from 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better health-related quality of life and function.

Time frame
baseline, pre-intervention and at the 1st follow up
4

Remaining questions

assessing remaining open questions with regards to the FND diagnosis after the psychoeducation and diagnosis explanation , asked by the study team

Time frame
immediately after the intervention and at the first follow up

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.