About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of pulmonary vein isolation on atrial function between pulse-field and cryoablation in patients over the age of 18 with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The main question it aims to answer is:
• Is catheter ablation energy (pulse field ablation) revealing a better preservation of the atrial function architecture than with conventional catheter ablation technologies ?
Participants will performed 2 IRMs with injection and completed Quality of Life Questionnaires. They participate in the study for 4 months.
Researchers will compare 2 arms:
* Pulse-Field Ablation * Cryoablation
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patient age ≥ 18
Established diagnosis of paroxysmal fibrillation, with a I/IIa/IIb indication for catheter ablation (ESC 2020 guidelines)
Episode of AF documented by ECG within the last 12 months
Patient able to give written informed consent
Disqualifiers
Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Contraindication to oral anticoagulation
Intracardiac thrombus
Previous ablation in the left atrium
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Pulmonary vein isolation by pulse field ablation
Procedure/SurgeryPulse Field Ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal energy based on high voltage, ultra-short energy pulses applied selectively to cardiomyocytes.
Pulmonary vein isolation by cryoablation
Procedure/SurgeryCryoablation is a conventional thermal energy, also delivered with a single-shot cryoballoon device.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Difference between baseline (pre-ablation) and post-ablation in the amount of left atrial fibrosis such as quantified by 3D late gadolinium enhancement (g, %) (related to primary objective) (MRI measurement)
Secondary outcomes
Difference between baseline (pre-ablation) and post-ablation in global left atrial strain (%) (related to secondary objective 1) (MRI measurement)
Difference between baseline (pre-ablation) and post-ablation in regional left atrial strains (%) (related to secondary objective 1) (MRI measurement)
Difference between baseline (pre-ablation) and post-ablation LA adipose tissue, measured by CT (cm2, mm3, %) (related to secondary objective 1 and 2) (CT measurement)
Difference between baseline (pre-ablation) and post-ablation left atrial flow assessed by 4D-flow MRI (related to secondary objective 3) (MRI measurement)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.