The Effect of Scenario-Based Simulation Training for Nutritional Counseling During Pregnancy on Nursing Students' Anxiety Levels, Self-Efficacy Perceptions, and Clinical Skill Performance

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAyşenur Karakuş

About this trial

The Effect of Scenario-Based Simulation Training for Nutritional Counseling During Pregnancy on Nursing Students' Anxiety Levels, Self-Efficacy Perceptions, and Clinical Skill Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Research Hypotheses

H1: Scenario-based simulation training significantly reduces anxiety levels among nursing students.

H2: Scenario-based simulation training significantly increases nursing students' perceived self-efficacy.

H3: Scenario-based simulation training significantly improves nursing students' clinical skill performance.

H0₁: Scenario-based simulation training has no statistically significant effect on nursing students' anxiety levels.

H0₂: Scenario-based simulation training has no statistically significant effect on nursing students' perceived self-efficacy.

H0₃: Scenario-based simulation training has no statistically significant effect on nursing students' clinical skill performance.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Department of Nursing.

Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent.

No previous participation in scenario-based simulation training on pregnancy nutrition counseling or a similar topic.

Disqualifiers

Failure to attend the intervention or complete the study procedures.

Incomplete completion of the pretest or posttest questionnaires.

Withdrawal from the study at any stage

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Participants completed the pretest, received a scenario-based pregnancy nutrition counseling simulation, and then completed the posttest and clinical skill assessment.

    Behavioral

    Participants in the intervention group received a researcher-developed scenario-based simulation on pregnancy nutrition counseling in a simulated outpatient clinic setting. The intervention consisted of a 20-minute simulation session followed by a 20-minute structured debriefing facilitated by the researchers. Clinical skill performance was evaluated using a standardized skills checklist.

Treatment groups

52 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ExperimentalExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: ControlNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Clinical Skill Performance

Clinical skill performance will be evaluated using the Pregnancy Nutrition Counseling Skills Checklist, an 18-item instrument developed by the researchers based on the relevant literature. The checklist assesses students' competency in providing pregnancy nutrition counseling, including therapeutic communication, history taking, assessment of maternal nutritional status, identification of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk factors, development of individualized nutrition counseling plans, application of motivational interviewing techniques, patient education, and follow-up planning. Each item is rated as "Performed," "Partially Performed," or "Not Performed." Students are expected to demonstrate these competencies while managing a standardized pregnancy nutrition counseling scenario. Total clinical skill performance scores obtained after the intervention will be compared between the intervention and control groups, with higher scores indicating better clinical performance.

Time frame
Immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in State Anxiety Level

Anxiety will be assessed using the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The 20-item SAI measures current state anxiety (score range: 20-80), with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. The 21-item BAI assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms experienced during the previous week (score range: 0-63), classified as minimal (0-7), mild (8-15), moderate (16-25), or severe (26-63). Both instruments will be administered immediately before and after the intervention. Pretest scores will establish baseline anxiety levels, while posttest scores will evaluate changes following the intervention. Reductions in SAI and BAI scores will indicate improved anxiety outcomes. Score changes will be compared between the intervention and control groups to evaluate the effectiveness of the scenario-based simulation training.

Time frame
Immediately before and immediately after the intervention
2

Change in Perceived Self-Efficacy

Perceived self-efficacy will be assessed using the Nursing Learning Self-Efficacy Scale. The scale consists of 21 items across five domains: conceptual understanding, higher-order cognitive skills, practical work, everyday application, and nursing communication. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Total scores range from 21 to 105, with lower scores indicating lower perceived self-efficacy and higher scores indicating greater perceived self-efficacy in nursing learning. The Turkish version demonstrated excellent content validity (language CVI = 0.95; content CVI = 0.92) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95). In the present study, the Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.993. Participants will complete the scale before and after the intervention. Changes in mean scores will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

Time frame
Immediately before and immediately after the intervention

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Ayşenur Karakuş

Lead sponsor

Eskisehir Osmangazi University

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: