The Effectiveness of Gamified Scenario-based Teaching in Improving Nurses' Awareness and Confidence in Clinical Emergency Care

ConditionEducation
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-50
SponsorTaipei Medical University WanFang Hospital

About this trial

Research Objective: This study aims to explore the effectiveness of gamified situational teaching in improving nurses' awareness and confidence in clinical emergency response.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • gamified scenario-based teaching

    Other intervention

    A randomized controlled trial design was used, employing convenient sampling to recruit 68 nurses from a general ward of a medical center in northern Taiwan. Research tools included demographic and related data, an emergency knowledge scale, a self-confidence scale, and satisfaction assessment

Treatment groups

68 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Gamified Contextual TeachingExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

First Aid Skills Questionnaire

This study used a randomized controlled trial design. Blocked randomization was employed, dividing participants into an experimental group (gamified learning) and a control group (online video instruction). The experimental group learned first aid techniques using gamified learning, which involved taking photos of clinical first aid scenarios and placing them into the application. The application then transformed the photos into story scenarios, which the experimental group members would then immerse themselves in. The control group received instruction using existing online videos from the hospital.Two groups were enrolled using the hospital's emergency medical knowledge questionnaire at three stages: before intervention, after intervention, and one month after intervention. The questionnaire consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions. A correct answer was worth 10 points, while an incorrect answer or an answer that did not know was worth 0 points. The total score ranged from 0 to 100

Time frame
one month

Secondary outcomes

1

Confidence Scale

The C-scale (Grundy, 1993) was used for measurement. This scale has been translated into Chinese by scholars. The scale has a Cronbach's α value of 0.91 and a CVI value of 1.0, indicating good quantity-response reliability and validity. This scale consists of five items, with each item scored from one to five points, for a total score of 5 to 25 points. Higher scores indicate greater confidence in the research subjects' emergency treatment and techniques.

Time frame
one month

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: