About this trial
This pilot study will test whether a school-based neurodevelopmental brain-training program, called the Melillo Method®, is feasible to deliver and study in elementary and middle school students who are struggling with behavior and learning. The study will enroll about 34 children ages 8 and older at two schools in Illinois. Children will be identified by teachers and school staff as needing extra support, and families will complete a brief questionnaire to confirm eligibility.
Children who qualify will be randomly assigned to start the program right away (24 weeks of sessions) or after a delay (12 weeks of sessions, starting partway through the study). This "delayed-start" design lets every enrolled child eventually receive the program while still allowing researchers to compare outcomes between children who started earlier versus later.
The program combines sensory stimulation (lights, gentle vibration, scent), rhythm-based exercises, primitive reflex integration activities, and balance/coordination training, delivered by a trained clinician in small groups of two. Sessions occur three times per week for about 20 minutes each.
Researchers will measure whether the study procedures are practical and acceptable. For example, how many eligible families enroll, how well families and teachers complete follow-up questionnaires, how well students tolerate the assessments, and how consistently families attend sessions. As a secondary goal, the study will explore whether children show changes in thinking skills, fine motor coordination, and emotional/behavioral functioning, measured using standardized tools (the NIH Toolbox and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) completed by the children, their parents, and their teachers.
This is a feasibility study. It is not intended to prove that the program works, but rather to determine whether a larger, more rigorous trial is realistic and well-designed.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
8+ years old
Attends Roodhouse Elementary or North Greene Jr. High School
Screening SDQ-P Total Difficulties Score ≥17 and Total Impact Score ≥2
Disqualifiers
History of Epilepsy
Diagnosis of Oppositional Defiance Disorder (ODD) or Conduct Disorder (CD)
Impairments that preclude standardized administration of the assessments and/or therapy (e.g., uncorrected visual or hearing loss, paralysis of the arms or legs)
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Melillo Method
Procedure/SurgeryThe intervention is delivered by a Melillo Method-certified clinician and a trained assistant in dyadic (n=2) small-group format, three sessions weekly. This group size is intended to preserve a high clinician-to-student ratio for individualized manual therapy while allowing structured peer-to-peer engagement during cooperative timing tasks. Each intervention block begins and concludes with a standardized neurodevelopmental assessment (primitive reflex grading, postural and oculomotor evaluation, Interactive Metronome baseline timing metrics) to characterize functional status independent of the ongoing outcome battery. Participants are assigned to a right- or left-hemisphere-targeted stimulation protocol based on clinical synthesis of neurobehavioral history and observed asymmetry patterns, determining the laterality of sensory stimulation (visual, tactile-vibratory, olfactory, and auditory) and the directionality of oculomotor an
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Proportion of consenting parents
Number of parents who consent, divided by the total number of eligible students identified via the online screen. This assesses 'Consent rate'
Proportion Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire - Teacher version (SDQ-T) completed
The number of SDQ-T surveys completed, divided by the total number of SDQ-T surveys sent. This assesses teacher-level 'Response'
Proportion Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire - Parent version (SDQ-P) completed
The number of SDQ-T surveys completed, divided by the total number of SDQ-T surveys sent. This assesses parent-level 'Response'
Proportion of completed assessment batteries
The number of completed assessment batteries, divided by the total number of attempted assessment batteries. This assesses 'Tolerability'
Secondary outcomes
Change difference in NIH Toolbox (v3) Cognition Battery Composites
Between-group change differences in the NIH Toolbox (v3) cognition battery composite scores. Recommended for ages 7+, the cognition battery involves a series of engaging and challenging cognitive tasks which yield the following summary age-adjusted standard scores (M=100, SD=15): 1) Total Cognition Composite, 2) Fluid Composite = Dimensional Change Card Sort + Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention + Picture Sequence Memory + List Sorting Working Memory + Pattern Comparison Processing Speed, and 3) Crystallized Composite = Picture Vocabulary + Oral Reading Recognition.
Change difference in NIH Toolbox (v3) Emotion Battery Composites
Between-group change differences in the NIH Toolbox (v3) emotion battery composite scores. Recommended for ages 8+, the emotion battery provides a multidimensional assessment of emotional health across four theoretical domains: 1) Negative Affect, 2) Psychological Well-Being, 3) Social Relationships, and 4) Stress and Self-Efficacy. This battery incorporates Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) based on Item Response Theory to dynamically select items tailored to each child's responses. This adaptive framework ensures high measurement precision across the entire ability spectrum, effectively eliminating 'floor and ceiling' effects while minimizing participant burden. Age- and sex-corrected subscale T-scores (M=50, SD=10), automatically generated by the NIH Toolbox v3 app, will be combined to derive four higher-order composites: 1) Negative Affect, 2) Psychological Well-Being, 3) Negative Social Perception, and 4) Social Satisfaction.
Change difference in the NIH Toolbox (v3) 9-hold Pegboard Dexterity Test
Between-group change differences in the NIH Toolbox (v3) 9-hold pegboard dexterity test. This assessment of fine motor control requires students to pick up 9 pegs from a container, place them into 9 corresponding holes on a board, and then remove them as quickly as possible. The task is performed twice, once with the dominant hand and once with the non-dominant hand. The raw score, measured as the total time in seconds taken to complete the task for each hand, is converted into an age-adjusted standard score (M=100, SD=15) based on national norms.
Change difference in the Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire - Parent (SDQ-P)
Between-group change difference in the SDQ-P. The SDQ is a validated, brief (25-item) instrument normed for children (ages 4-10) and adolescents (ages 11-17) that assesses five subscales: Emotional Symptoms, Conduct Problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer Problems, and Prosocial Behavior \[19\]. Each item is scored on a 3-point Likert scale (0 = 'Not True', 1 = 'Somewhat True', 2 = 'Certainly True'). The 20 items from the four problem-oriented subscales are summed to yield a Total Difficulties Score (0 to 40). The remaining 5 items comprise the Prosocial Behavior subscale, which is scored independently (0 to 10) to provide a standalone measure of positive social assets.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.