The Efficacy of Metacognitive Skills Training in the Context of Forensic Psychiatric Care

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Jyvaskyla

About this trial

Deficiencies in social cognition are part of the core symptomatology of psychotic disorders. And deficiencies in social cognition, the closely related concept of metacognition, and, for example, paranoid attitudes are all associated with violence. The link between social cognition and violence is also observed through rehabilitation, as both group-based Social Cognition Interaction Training (SCIT) and group-based Metacognitive Skills Training (MCT) have reduced violent behavior in patients with psychotic disorders. Thus, a better knowledge of social cognition and its rehabilitation in psychotic disorders can help to reduce risky behavior and to rehabilitate the significant social difficulties often found in psychotic disorders. This research study aims to examine factors underlying the efficacy of group-based MCT.

The goal of the metacognitive skills training group developed by Moritz and partners is to strengthen the social and metacognitive skills of the patients participating in the group. The group consists of 10 sessions during which exercises and discussion are emphasized. The themes of the group sessions are, for example, jumping to conclusions -bias, empathy, and memory. Detailed information is available from the MCT website (https://clinical-neuropsychology.de/metacognitive\_training-psychosis/). Overall there is meta-analysis-level evidence for the moderate effectiveness of MCT on positive symptoms of psychotic illnesses, such as delusions. Prior studies have argued that the unique factor underpinning MCT's efficacy is its impact on various cognitive biases, and that participating in the group especially reduces patients' tendency to jump to conclusions, which is a cognitive style associated with delusions and deficits in social perception and reasoning. As delusionality is related to the risk of violence, these results form a logical link between jumping to conclusions, delusionality, and violence.

But the results regarding the effectiveness of MCT are still somewhat conflicting, and studies seem to be of varying quality. Additional longitudinal research and research related to the jumping to conclusion bias are also needed. The hypothesis regarding this study is that the MCT group reduces patients' tendency to jump to conclusions. These reductions are presumed to be associated in one-year follow-up with fewer mood symptoms, delusions, paranoia, and more psychological flexibility.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Willingness to participate in a scientific study

Diagnosis of a psychosis spectrum disorder

Finnish language skills due to questionnaires and psychological tests being in Finnish

Disqualifiers

Psychosis that severely deteriorates the ability to function

Cognitive problems that severely deteriorate the ability to function

Guardianship established for personal matters

Willingness to participate in a scientific study

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Metacognitive Skills Training (MCT)

    Behavioral

    The goal of the metacognitive skills training group developed by Moritz and co. is to strengthen the social and metacognitive skills of the patients participating in the group. The group consists of 10 sessions during which exercises and discussion are emphasized. The themes of the group sessions are, for example, jumping to conclusions -bias, empathy, and memory. Detailed information is available from the MCT website (https://clinical-neuropsychology.de/metacognitive\_training-psychosis/). Overall there is meta-analysis-level evidence for the moderate effectiveness of MCT on positive symptoms of psychotic illnesses, such as delusions. Prior studies have argued that the unique factor underpinning MCT's efficacy is its impact on various cognitive biases, and that participating in the group especially reduces patients' tendency to jump to conclusions, which is a cognitive style associated with delusions and deficits in social perception and reasoning.

  • Treatment as usual

    Other intervention

    Medicinal treatment deemed appropriate by the attending physician, psychiatric ward treatment, and others forms of treatment recommended to the patients based on their treatment plans (e.g., work therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, talk therapy)

Treatment groups

85 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Intervention groupExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Patient controlsActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Non-patient controlsNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Jumping to conclusions bias

The bias is measured using a revised version of the beads task. This is a test of optimal performance, meaning that both low and high scores can be problematic.

Time frame
For the intervention group, the measurement is done before the group and nine months after completion. For the control groups, the time interval is one year.

Secondary outcomes

1

Paranoia and psychotic experiences

Paranoia and psychotic experiences assessed with the Symptoms Checklist 90 self-report questionnaire. The scale for paranoia goes from 0 to 24 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. The scale for psychotic experiences goes from 0 to 40 with higher scores meaning worse outcome

Time frame
For the intervention group, the measurement is done before the group and nine months after completion. For the control groups, the time interval is one year.
2

Mood symptoms

Mood symptoms assessed with Symptoms Checklist 90 self-report questionnaire. The sum for scales measuring depression and anxiety goes from 0 to 92 with higher scores meaning worse outcome.

Time frame
For the intervention group, the measurement is done before the group and nine months after completion. For the control groups, the time interval is one year.
3

Psychological flexibility

Psychological flexibility assessed with the the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes - Short Form (CompACT-8) self-report questionnaire. The total CompACT score ranges from 0-48, with higher scores indicating greater psychological flexibility: The ability to attend and adapt to situational demands in the pursuit of personally-meaningful longer-term goals.

Time frame
For the intervention group, the measurement is done before the group and nine months after completion. For the control groups, the time interval is one year.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Jyvaskyla

Lead sponsor

Vanha Vaasa Hospital

Collaborator