The Impact of Cigar Pack Marketing With "Natural" Themes on Young Adults

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-34
SponsorRutgers, The State University of New Jersey

About this trial

The goal of this online survey experiment is to examine the effect of "natural" descriptors and images on cigar packs among young adults (ages 18-34) who have either used cigars in the past year or are non-users who are susceptible to use. The study will compare effects of cigar pack images with or without "natural" descriptors (that explicitly say "natural" vs. imply naturalness with the word "leaf"), with or without "natural" images (such as leaves), and with or without images of cigar sticks (that are rough-cut (e.g., darker wrapper color with more visible leaf lines) vs. smooth) on product perceptions, intentions to use cigars, and recall.

Participants will be randomized to one of 18 conditions and will be shown four cigar pack images from various brands within their condition. After seeing the images, they will complete survey questions assessing product perceptions, intentions, and recall, and will complete other embedded tasks in the survey, before being debriefed about the harms of cigars.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

English survey takers in the US

Age: Young adults ages 18-34

ever used any type of cigar or cigarillo (including for blunt use)

used any type of cigar or cigarillo in the past 12 months (including for blunt use)

Disqualifiers

Research panel participants who do not meet the criteria outlined above will be excluded.

Trial design

Design model

Factorial

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Natural Descriptor Type - Explicit

    Behavioral

    Participants will view cigar packs with descriptors which explicitly refer to "naturalness" (i.e., "natural" or "natural leaf")

  • Natural Descriptor Type - Implicit

    Behavioral

    Participants will view cigar packs which do not use the word "natural, but use "leaf" descriptors, which may implicitly refer to "naturalness"

  • Natural Descriptor Type - Absent

    Behavioral

    Participants will view cigar packs which do not use any "natural" or "leaf" descriptors

  • Natural Imagery - Present

    Behavioral

    Participants will view cigar packs which include imagery that may communicate themes of "naturalness" (e.g., images of leaves)

  • Natural Imagery - Absent

    Behavioral

    Participants will view cigar packs without imagery that may communicate themes of "naturalness" (e.g., leaves)

  • Cigar Image Type - Smooth

    Behavioral

    Participants will view cigar packs featuring an image of smooth-cut cigars on them.

  • Cigar Image Type - Rough Cut

    Behavioral

    Participants will view cigar packs featuring an image of rough-cut cigars on them.

  • Cigar Image Type - None

    Behavioral

    Participants will view cigar packs which do not show any images of cigars on them.

Treatment groups

3,500 Participants
are divided into 18 treatment groups

18

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: Group 1 (Explicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, Smooth Cigars)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Group 2 (Explicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, Rough-Cut Cigars)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group C: Group 3 (Explicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, No Cigar Image)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group D: Group 4 (Explicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, Smooth Cigars)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group E: Group 5 (Explicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, Rough-cut cigars)Experimental treatment 2 interventions
Group F: Group 6 (Explicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, No Cigar Image)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group G: Group 7: Implicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, Smooth CigarsExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group H: Group 8 (Implicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, Rough-Cut Cigars)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group I: Group 9 (Implicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, No Cigar Image)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group J: Group 10 (Implicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, Smooth Cigars)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group K: Group 11 (Implicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, Rough-cut cigars)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group L: Group 12 (Implicit Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, No Cigars)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group M: Group 13: Absent Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, Smooth CigarsExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group N: Group 14 (Absent Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, Rough-Cut Cigars)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group O: Group 15: Absent Descriptor, Natural Imagery Present, No CigarsExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group P: Group 16: Absent Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, Smooth CigarsExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group Q: Group 17 (Absent Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, Rough-Cut Cigars)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group R: Group 18 (Absent Descriptor, Natural Imagery Absent, No Cigar Image)Experimental treatment 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Product Perceptions: Naturalness

Assessment of perceived "naturalness" of the viewed cigar product. Responses to 3 parallel questions (each asking about a different perception related to "naturalness") will be averaged together in a composite item. The question states: "To what extent, if at all, do you think this product would...: 1) Be pure? 2) Be additive-free? 3) Be organic?". Responses to each will be on a 5-point scale (from 1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=somewhat, 4=quite a bit, 5=a great deal), and responses will be averaged across the three items. Higher scores indicate perceiving the viewed cigar product as more synonymous with "natural."

Time frame
Day 1 (during study stimuli exposure)
2

Risk Perceptions: Exposure to Harmful Chemicals

Assessment of perceived risk of being exposed to harmful chemicals if they use the viewed product: "To what extent, if at all, do you think these products would expose users to harmful chemicals?" (1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=somewhat, 4=quite a bit, 5=a great deal). Higher scores mean thinking the viewed product would expose users to harmful chemicals to a greater extent.

Time frame
Day 1 (during study stimuli exposure)
3

General Perceived Harmfulness

Assessment of the general perceived harmfulness of the viewed cigar product: "To what extent, if at all, do you think this product would be harmful to health?" (1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=somewhat, 4=quite a bit, 5=a great deal). Higher scores mean thinking the viewed cigar product would be harmful to health, to a greater extent.

Time frame
Day 1 (during study stimuli exposure)
4

Relative Harm Perceptions

Assessment of perceived harmfulness of the viewed cigar products relative to cigarettes: "How harmful to health do you think these products are compared to cigarettes?" (1=a lot less harmful, 2=somewhat less harmful, 3=about as harmful, 4=somewhat more harmful, 5=a lot more harmful). Higher scores mean thinking the viewed cigar products are more harmful than cigarettes.

Time frame
Day 1 (immediately after viewing study stimuli)

Secondary outcomes

1

Product Perceptions: Satisfying

Assessment of perceived satisfaction from using the viewed cigar product: "To what extent, if at all, do you think these products would be satisfying?" (1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=somewhat, 4=quite a bit, 5=a great deal). Higher scores mean thinking the viewed cigar product would be satisfying to a greater extent.

Time frame
Day 1 (during study stimuli exposure)
2

Product Perceptions: Harshness

Assessment of the perceived extent to which the viewed cigar product will be harsh tasting: "To what extent, if at all, do you think these products would be harsh tasting?" (1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=somewhat, 4=quite a bit, 5=a great deal). Higher scores mean thinking the viewed cigar product would be harsh tasting to a greater extent.

Time frame
Day 1 (during study stimuli exposure)
3

Future Use Interest

Assessment of interest in using the viewed cigar products in the near future: "Thinking about the products you just saw, how interested, if at all, are you in using any of them in the next 6 months?" (1=not at all interested, 2=not very interested, 3=somewhat interested, 4=very interested, 5=extremely interested). Higher scores indicate a greater level of interest in using the viewed cigar products.

Time frame
Day 1 (immediately after viewing study stimuli)
4

Susceptibility

Three item measures that will be assessed together to assess future susceptibility to using the viewed cigar products: 1) "Thinking about the products you just saw, do you think that you will try any of them soon?"; 2) "Thinking about the products you just saw, do you think that you will use any of them in the next year?"; 3) "If one of your best friends were to offer you any of the products you saw, would you try them?" Each item will be assessed on a 4-point scale (1=definitely not, 2=probably not, 3=probably yes, 4=definitely yes). If indicated anything other than "definitely not" to all three items, participants will be considered "susceptible" to future use of the viewed cigar products.

Time frame
Day 1 (immediately after viewing study stimuli)

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: