About this trial
Introduction Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic condition that affects the gastrointestinal tract and has a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QoL) and mental health(Barberio, Zamani et al. 2021). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been recognized as a potential therapeutic approach to address the psychological comorbidities associated with IBD(Seaton, Hudson et al. 2024). However, the effectiveness of CBT in IBD is not solely a clinical issue but is also intertwined with cultural factors that can influence treatment outcomes(Naeem 2019).
The effectiveness of CBT in IBD is not solely a clinical issue but is also intertwined with cultural factors that can influence treatment outcomes . This has implications for the delivery of CBT in IBD care, as cultural beliefs and values can affect help-seeking behaviors and responses to treatment. Cultural factors are integral to the successful implementation of CBT in IBD care(Hinton and Patel 2017, Naeem, Sajid et al. 2023). Further research is needed to understand how cultural adaptations can enhance the efficacy of CBT for IBD patients from diverse backgrounds. It is essential to consider cultural nuances in the development and delivery of CBT to ensure that it is both effective and acceptable to patients with IBD across different cultures.
Objective: To identify gaps in the current understanding of the role of culture in CBT for IBD, including the variety of cultural contexts and IBD populations studied . To provide insights that can guide clinical practice in offering culturally competent CBT to IBD patients and inform policy decisions regarding mental health services for diverse populations with IBD .
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients over 18 years of age with diagnosed IBD.
Age: 18 years and older.
residing in China, able to verbally communicate and read in Chinese, with access to the internet to ensure participation in the online intervention.
Able to commit to attend the 6weekly sessions of 1 hours' duration.
Disqualifiers
Individuals scheduled for major surgery in the next 3 months.
Current psychological treatment.
Individuals with severe schizophrenia/psychotic disorder.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
cognitive-behavioral therapy
Other interventionThe treatment will consist of eight weekly sessions, each lasting one hour. The first session will focus on the rationale of cognitive behavioral therapy, i.e. the influence of (irrational or dysfunctional) cognitions and attitudes on (restrictive) feelings and behaviors. Additionally, goal setting will be initiated. Since patients may have a wide diversity of psychiatric problems (i.e. PTSD, anxiety disorders and depression), the treatment manual will encompass five optional modules for the therapist that focus on each of these disorders (i.e. exposure based for anxiety and PTSD, behavioral activation for depression). The subsequent sessions (2-6) will target teaching the patient to identify and challenge dysfunctional cognitions and attitudes related to IBD. Each session will address specific illness-related cognitions. If possible, dysfunctional cognitions and attitudes will be replaced by helpful cognitions and attitudes.
Wait first, then cognitive-behavioral therapy
Other interventionparticipants assigned to the waiting-list control condition will wait 3.5 months before they are treated with CBT. This period corresponds to the duration of the CBT intervention and follow-up assessment of the experimental group. After this 3.5 month waiting period the participants in the waiting-list control condition will be asked to complete a follow-up after waiting/baseline before CBT assessment before starting treatment.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
mood
anxiety and depression Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item Scale(GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale (PHQ-9) assesses the possible presence of anxiety and depressive states. The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 is considered to be unbiased by the presence of somatic illness and is found to be reliable and valid . It consists of two sub-scales, anxiety and depression, both containing seven items.
Secondary outcomes
stigma
The Social Impact Scale (SIS) was used to evaluate stigma associated with wound malodor. The SIS is widely used in patients with chronic diseases and includes 24 items within four dimensions, social exclusion, economic discrimination, inner sense of shame, and social isolation, evaluated using a Likert4 method. Total possible score ranged from 24 points to 96 points, with higher scores associated with a greater perceived social impact.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Wang Zhen
Lead sponsor
Zhejiang University
Sponsor institution
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: