The Influence of Systematic Psychological Intervention on Patients About VSD Drainage Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

About this trial

This study focuses on providing clinical care to patients undergoing VSD drainage surgery for chronic wounds, while also paying attention to the impact of negative emotions such as depression and anxiety, as well as quality of life and social support, on the patients' physical and mental well-being. It observes the influence of psychology on patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Psychological Intervention Group

    Behavioral

    The intervention group provides psychological education to patients, emphasizing participation in a "Surgery Success" patient group organized by researchers, and collects successful patient cases for promotion. Patients are encouraged to learn from successful cases within the group. Psychological intervention is also provided to family members, as they are the primary caregivers, and guiding their thoughts is crucial. Timely identification of patients with psychological abnormalities is conducted, with psychological consultations if necessary. Targeted measures are taken for patients with psychological abnormalities. Upon discharge, one-on-one consultation and tracking services are provided by designated nurses to alleviate patients' feelings of helplessness and despair, continuing until the patient fully recovers.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Psychological Intervention GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Routine care groupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)

The Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) was developed by W.K. Zung in 1971. This scale consists of 20 items reflecting subjective feelings of anxiety, with each item rated on a four-point scale based on the frequency of symptoms. The scoring criteria are as follows: "1" indicates none or very little time; "2" indicates some of the time; "3" indicates a good part of the time; "4" indicates most or all of the time.According to normative results, in China, the standard deviation cutoff for SAS is 53 points. The divisions are as follows:53 to 62 points: Mild anxiety,63 to 72 points: Moderate anxiety,Above 72 points: Severe anxiety.

Time frame
After 4 weeks of intervention
2

self-rating depression scale (SDS)

The Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) was developed by W.K. Zung in 1965. This scale comprises 20 items reflecting subjective feelings of depression, with each item rated on a four-point scale based on the frequency of symptoms. For positively scored items, the ratings are 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively, while for negatively scored items, they are 4, 3, 2, 1. The normal upper limit for the total raw score of SDS is 41 points, with lower scores indicating better states. The standard score is obtained by multiplying the total raw score by 1.25 and taking the integer part. The standard deviation cutoff for SDS is 53 points. The divisions are as follows:53 to 62points:Mild depression,63 to 72 points: Moderate depression,Above 73 points: Severe depression.

Time frame
After 4 weeks of intervention

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient satisfaction with hospitalization

The satisfaction was calculated using our hospital's unified discharge satisfaction questionnaire for inpatients. Each item is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a total of 20 items and a maximum score of 100 points. Scores above 95 are considered satisfied, scores between 90 and 95 are deemed basically satisfied, and scores below 90 indicate dissatisfaction.

Time frame
After 4 weeks of intervention

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.