The Interplay Between Moral Distress, Moral Resilience, and Mental Health Outcomes Among Neonatal Care Providers

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

About this trial

Due to highly specialized medical care neonatal care providers are faced with numerous responsibilities which makes neonatal care a particularly challenging and stressful work environment. Moral Distress (MoD) is an increasingly perceived phenomenon, which occurs if a person is prevented from doing what she or he believe is morally right. Such situations are common in neonatal care and MoD has severe negative consequences, including burnout and resignation. There is a significant gap of knowledge on the prevalence of MoD among neonatal care providers. In addition, the complex interplay between MoD and burnout is largely unexplored. The understanding of MoD and the exploration of possible influencing factors are indispensable prerequisites for effectively targeting and mitigating the negative effects of MoD.

Aims: This project aims at providing normative data on the prevalence of MoD among neonatal care providers in German speaking Switzerland. This project will further explore the interplay between MoD and burnout as well as the role of protective and reinforcing factors including moral resilience, perceived stress, mental health and workload.

Design: A prospective observational mixed methods study will be conducted among neonatal care providers in Swiss secondary and tertiary care neonatal units. Over a one-year period, neonatal care providers will be repeatedly asked to answer a survey on MoD and associated outcomes. Semi-structured interviews will be performed to gain detailed information on what constitutes MoD.

Significance: The study results will allow a robust assessment of the extent of MoD in the neonatal care environment. They will further provide information regarding the feasibility of a continuous screening approach. In the effort to optimize the work environment of healthcare workers in ethically complex clinical settings, in-depth exploration MoD is indispensable. The results of this study may help establish an approach to continuous assessment, and thus provide a basis for verifiable interventions.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Neonatal care providers working in a Department of Neonatology or a Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine with focus on neonates, regardless of professional group or level of education (all health care professionals - e.g., nurses, neonatologists, intensivists, residents, psychologists, fellows, nursing and medical students).

At least 2 weeks of practice on the unit in the 3 months prior to each survey.

Written informed consent

Self-reported sufficient knowledge of the German language

Disqualifiers

Self-reported acute psychiatric illness

Trial population

Neonatal care providers will be approached locally by the researchers themselves. Selection will be based on the list of inclusion criteria. Informed consent: Participants will receive electronic study information in REDCap, via e-mail and podcast and will give written informed consent at the time of recruitment. Participation is completely voluntary and no negative consequences will arise when participation is denied. Participants are informed that they may withdraw from the study at any time without consequence.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

No trial groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Moral Distress

Composite score (frequency x intensity) of the Revised Moral Distress Scale (MDS-R). The MDS-R is a more specific 21-item instrument that allows evaluating the frequency and intensity of MoD in clinical contexts. (There is a 0 to 4 Likert score for each questions for frequency and intensity Then for each item, the frequency × intensity (fxi) score is calculated, which ranges from 0 to 16. Next, the composite score is obtained by summing each item's fxi score. The resulting score based on 21 items has a range of 0-336. A higher score indicating a more frequent and more intense Moral Distress)

Time frame
1 year

Secondary outcomes

1

Secondary endpoints

Sum score of Wocial's Moral Distress Thermometer (MDT). The MDT is a rapid screening tool to detect MoD. (Scale from 1 to 10, with higher values indicating more Moral Distress)

Time frame
1 year
2

Secondary endpoints

Sum score of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) - The MBI is a standardized measurement instrument for the assessment burnout syndrome. (Scale from 0 to 6, 22 items, 3 factors: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, higher score indicating higher degrees fo each factor, for exhaustion and depersonalization higher scores indicate higher burnout, for accomplishment higher scores indicate lower burnout)

Time frame
1 year
3

Secondary endpoints

Sum score of the Muir matches scale - The Muir matches scale is a visual scale that allows participants to point at one of eight matches to indicate how burnt out they feel. (number 8 indicating the highest level of burnout)

Time frame
1 year
4

Secondary endpoints

Differences in MDS-R site-specific. The MDS-R is a more specific 21-item instrument that allows evaluating the frequency and intensity of MoD in clinical contexts. (There is a 0 to 4 Likert score for each questions for frequency and intensity Then for each item, the frequency × intensity (fxi) score is calculated, which ranges from 0 to 16. Next, the composite score is obtained by summing each item's fxi score. The resulting score based on 21 items has a range of 0-336. A higher score indicating a more frequent and more intense Moral Distress)

Time frame
1 year

Other outcomes

1

Further outcomes

Free-text comments from the questionnaire. There is no scale/score in this outcome because participants are free to write down any text concerning moral distress or burnout.

Time frame
1 year
2

Further outcomes

Semi-structured interviews with selected participants, convenience sample

Time frame
1 year

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.